Biobanking and risk assessment: a comprehensive typology of risks for an adaptive risk governance

Author:

Akyüz KayaORCID,Chassang GauthierORCID,Goisauf MelanieORCID,Kozera ŁukaszORCID,Mezinska SigneORCID,Tzortzatou OlgaORCID,Mayrhofer Michaela Th.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBiobanks act as the custodians for the access to and  responsible use of human biological samples and related data that have been generously donated by individuals to serve the public interest and scientific advances in the health research realm. Risk assessment has become a daily practice for biobanks and has been discussed from different perspectives. This paper aims to provide a literature review on risk assessment in order to put together a comprehensive typology of diverse risks biobanks could potentially face. Methodologically set as a typology, the conceptual approach used in this paper is based on the interdisciplinary analysis of scientific literature, the relevant ethical and legal instruments and practices in biobanking to identify how risks are assessed, considered and mitigated. Through an interdisciplinary mapping exercise, we have produced a typology of potential risks in biobanking, taking into consideration the perspectives of different stakeholders, such as institutional actors and publics, including participants and representative organizations. With this approach, we have identified the following risk types: economic, infrastructural, institutional, research community risks and participant’s risks. The paper concludes by highlighting the necessity of an adaptive risk governance as an integral part of good governance in biobanking. In this regard, it contributes to sustainability in biobanking by assisting in the design of relevant risk management practices, where they are not already in place or require an update. The typology is intended to be useful from the early stages of establishing such a complex and multileveled biomedical infrastructure as well as to provide a catalogue of risks for improving the risk management practices already in place.

Funder

H2020 Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Philosophy,Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)

Reference112 articles.

1. Aarden, Erik. 2017. Projecting and producing ‘usefulness’ of biomedical research infrastructures; or why the Singapore Tissue Network closed. Science and Public Policy 44 (6): 753–762. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scx010.

2. Astrin, Jonas J., and Fay Betsou. 2016. “Trends in Biobanking: A Bibliometric Overview.“. Biopreservation and Biobanking 14 (1): 65–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2015.0019.

3. Bisgaard, H., N. H. Vissing, C. G. Carson, A. L. Bischoff, N. V. Følsgaard, E. Kreiner-Møller, B. L. K. Chawes, J. Stokholm, L. Pedersen, E. Bjarnadóttir, A. H. Thysen, E. Nilsson, L. J. Mortensen, S. F. Olsen, S. Schjørring, K. A. Krogfelt, L. Lauritzen, S. Brix, and K. Bønnelykke. 2013. Deep phenotyping of the unselected COPSAC2010 birth cohort study. Clinical & Experimental Allergy 43 (12): 1384–1394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12213.

4. Black, L., D. Avard, M.H. Zawati, B.M. Knoppers, J. Hébert, G. Sauvageau, Project on behalf of the Leucegene. 2013. Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research. Clinical Genetics 84 (5): 397–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12190.

5. Borry, Pascal, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Martina C. Cornel, Heidi Carmen Howard, Oliver Feeney, and Leigh Jackson, Deborah Mascalzoni, Álvaro Mendes, Borut Peterlin, Brigida Riso, Mahsa Shabani, Heather Skirton, Sigrid Sterckx, Danya Vears, Matthias Wjst, and Heike Felzmann. 2018. “The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper.“ Journal of Community Genetics 9 (2):103–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-017-0331-7.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3