Author:
Ijaz Tehrim,Qazalbash Agha Haider Raza,Razzaq Ahmed Abdul,Rafique Muhammad Zeeshan,Khan Mohammad Aamir,Jamshaid Syeda Hadika
Abstract
AbstractClimate change stabilization at 1.5 to 2 °C requires a shift in paradigm of industries to transition to low carbon industries. The way forward to decarbonize industries is green manufacturing, as the environmental facet of manufacturing has often been compromised for the sake of economic gains. In order to implicate green manufacturing, it is incumbent upon manufacturing facilities to introduce such measures which ensure that carbon footprint and environmentally detrimental emissions are minimized. In this context, Life-cycle Assessment (LCA) is an excellent tool to record, analyze and critically review the environmental impact of a process. In order to investigate the environmental hotspots, the authors have performed LCA of an auto-parts manufacturing industry in Pakistan by using a unique gate-to-gate approach. ReCiPe Midpoint impact assessment method was utilized to investigate the effects of manufacturing and transportation related emissions of the monthly produce on climate change, fossil depletion, ionizing radiation and human toxicity. Furthermore, the authors discuss three scenarios, which include current state, optimized future state and an energy mix involving hydropower and photovoltaic generation. The results helped in developing a comprehensive framework for green manufacturing which suggests that the prerequisite of a green manufacturing process is an optimized process flow, which significantly reduces the environmental emissions up to 24%. Moreover, the use of photovoltaic cells results in 54% reduction, thus indicating that conventional hydropower systems in developing countries should be mixed with solar power to reduce the environmental burden. A detailed green manufacturing framework based on LCA is proposed by the authors to enhance the functionality and to improvise the carbon burden of the manufacturing sector of Pakistan.
Funder
Higher Education Commision, Pakistan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. UNEP. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products: Social and Socio-Economic LCA Guidelines Complementing Environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, Contributing to the Full Assessment of Goods and Services Within the Context of Sustainable Development. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2009.
2. Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan R, Christiansen K, Kluppel HJ. The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Ass. 2006;11:80–5.
3. Finkbeiner M. From the 40s to the 70s—the future of LCA in the ISO 14000 family. Int J Life Cycle Ass. 2013;18:1–4.
4. Kumar K, Lee D, Malhotra A. Methodology to assess the environmental impact of a product and its processes. Proc. SPIE. 2001;4193:204–14.
5. SETAC. Public Policy Applications of Life-Cycle Assessment: Proceedings from the Pellson Workshop on Application of Life-Cycle Assessment to Public Policy. In: Allen DT, Consoli FJ, Davis GA, Fava JA, Warren JL editors. Brussels: Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry; 1997.