Abstract
AbstractFor a successful economy, the interaction between research and its application in practice plays a key role. The aim of this paper is to analyze the institutional factors of patent activity at universities in the Czech Republic. The following five factors were selected for detailed investigation: budget from government, number of employees: professors, associate professor, and assistant professor, number of researchers and other employees, number of students (PhD, master, and bachelor), technology transfer workers. The patent activity analysis used methods of retrospective data analysis in the field of R&D activities, unstructured interviews, and statistical data processing. Following from the basic characteristics of the collected data, patent activity is related to the nature of universities, where technical universities are in leading positions in the monitored period of industrial-legal protection. However, the importance of encouraging innovation activity across all disciplines is crucial. The result of monitoring the dependency shows that a relationship of efficiencies and patent output is influenced by the size of a university. Secondly, there can be observed that technology transfer efficiency contributes more to the patent output that research staff efficiency.
Funder
Technology Agency the Czech Republic
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science,Information Systems,Management Information Systems
Reference31 articles.
1. Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D’Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. J. Manag. Stud, 45(8), 1424–1447.
2. Bronzini, P. (2014). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 2016, 45(2), 442–457.
3. Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2006) ‘Introduction and chapter summaries’, in Elias, G.C. and Campbell, D.F.J. (Eds.): Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe and Asia, Praeger, Westport, Connecticut, pp.ix–xxvi.
4. Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M. H. (2009). The determinants of academic research commercial performance, towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Res.Policy, 38(6), 936–946.
5. Chang, Y.C., et al.,2016. Entrepreneurial universities and research ambidexterity: a multilevel analysis. Technovation (2016), 54: 7-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.006i
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献