Enabling radical and potentially disruptive innovations through interdisciplinarity: challenges and practices in industrial companies

Author:

Schimpf SvenORCID,Weber Hanno,Gerlach Thomas

Abstract

AbstractThe motivation behind this paper and the underlying research is to shed light on how companies deal with interdisciplinary innovation activities, especially looking at the development of radical and potentially disruptive innovations. This includes the analysis of methods, processes, and organizational structures applied to support interdisciplinary innovation activities as well as challenges faced. Whereas this thematic field has been widely investigated for academic institutions and, in companies on a team level, there is only a little information on industrial companies’ current state. This understanding is especially important as shortening development cycles, and technological convergence combined with intersectoral innovations might lead to increases in radical and potentially disruptive innovations and thereby create the need for improved methods and structures throughout the innovation process. To gain insights into challenges and current practices of interdisciplinary collaboration in innovation activities, semi-structured exploratory interviews were carried out with representatives from seven industrial companies. Among others, the results of the study revealed that whereas many methodologies are said to support interdisciplinary innovation activities, a wide majority of these methodologies are applied for other reasons which make supporting interdisciplinarity seem like a kind of byproduct.

Funder

Hochschule Pforzheim - Gestaltung, Technik, Wirtschaft und Recht

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. Abbott, A. D. (2001): Chaos of disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/academiccompletetitles/home.action.

2. Aityan, S. K. (2022). Business research methodology. Springer International Publishing.

3. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks.

4. Bernstein, J. H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11(1), Article R1.

5. Bers, J. A., Dismukes, J. P., Miller, L. K., & Dubrovensky, A. (2009). Accelerated radical innovation: theory and application. In Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3