Author:
Moucheraud Corrina,Wollum Alexandra,Awan Muhammad Ali,Dow William H.,Friedman Willa,Koulidiati Jean-Louis,Sabasaba Amon,Shah Manisha,Wagner Zachary
Abstract
AbstractBeyond Bias was an intervention introduced in Burkina Faso, Pakistan and Tanzania, with the aim of reducing health worker bias toward young, unmarried and nulliparous women seeking family planning services. This study used qualitative methods – based on interviews with health workers who participated in the intervention, managers at health facilities that participated in the intervention, and policy and program stakeholders at the national level – to understand implementation experiences with the intervention. The results offer insights for organizations or countries seeking to implement Beyond Bias or similar programs, and point to some other key implementation challenges for multi-component interventions in lower-resource settings. The intervention, developed using a human-centered design approach, was seen as key for successful implementation but there were logistical challenges. The digital intervention was disruptive and distracting to many. In addition, the non-financial rewards intervention was perceived as complex, and some participants expressed feeling discouraged when they did not receive a reward. Beyond Bias did not sufficiently attend to the “outer setting,” and this was perceived as a major implementation barrier as it limited individuals’ capacity to fully achieve the desired behavior change; for example, space constraints meant that some health facilities could not ensure private services for all clients. There were scalability concerns related to cost, and there is uncertainty whether diversity of contexts (within and across countries) might constrain implementation of Beyond Bias at scale.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Vela MB, Erondu AI, Smith NA, Peek ME, Woodruff JN, Chin MH. Eliminating explicit and implicit biases in health care: evidence and research needs. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43:477–501.
2. Greenwald AG, Krieger LH. Implicit bias: scientific foundations. Calif law Rev. 2006;94(4):945–67.
3. Shelton JD, Angle MA. Medical barriers to access to family planning. Lancet. 1992;340(8831):1334–5.
4. Solo J, Festin M. Provider bias in family planning services: a review of its meaning and manifestations. Global Health: Sci Pract. 2019;7(3):371–85.
5. Calhoun LM, Speizer IS, Rimal R, Sripad P, Chatterjee N, Achyut P, Nanda P. Provider imposed restrictions to clients’ access to family planning in urban Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):1–13.