Looking inside the black box: a theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational materials (the Ontario printed educational message, OPEM) to improve referral and prescribing practices in primary care in Ontario, Canada-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Looking inside the black box: a theory-based process evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial of printed educational materials (the Ontario printed educational message, OPEM) to improve referral and prescribing practices in primary care in Ontario, Canada

Published:2007-11-26 Issue:1 Volume:2 Page:
ISSN:1748-5908
Container-title:Implementation Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Implementation Sci

Author:

Grimshaw Jeremy M,Zwarenstein Merrick,Tetroe Jacqueline M,Godin Gaston,Graham Ian D,Lemyre Louise,Eccles Martin P,Johnston Marie,Francis Jillian J,Hux Jan,O'Rourke Keith,Légaré France,Presseau Justin

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Informatics,Health Policy,General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1748-5908-2-38.pdf

Reference21 articles.

1. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA: Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998, 317: 465-468.

2. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Getting evidence into practice. Effective Health Care Bulletin. 1999, 5: 1-16.

3. Zwarenstein M, Hux JE, Kelsall DL, Paterson JM, Grimshaw JM, Davis DA: The Ontario Printed Educational Message Trial (OPEM). Implementation Science. 2005,

4. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay C, Vale L: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004, 8:

5. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Steen N, Parkin D, Purves I, McColl E: The design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate computerized decision support in primary care: the COGENT study. Fam Pract. 2000, 17: 180-186. 10.1093/fampra/17.2.180.

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A process evaluation of the NIDUS-Professional dementia training intervention for UK homecare workers;Age and Ageing;2024-05-01

2. Decentralising chronic disease management in sub-Saharan Africa: a protocol for the qualitative process evaluation of community-based integrated management of HIV, diabetes and hypertension in Tanzania and Uganda;BMJ Open;2024-03

3. Evaluating De‐Implementation Interventions;How to Reduce Overuse in Healthcare;2023-09-05

4. Implementing integrated care clinics for HIV-infection, diabetes and hypertension in Uganda (INTE-AFRICA): process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial;BMC Health Services Research;2023-06-02

5. Engagement is a necessary condition to test audit and feedback design features: results of a pragmatic, factorial, cluster-randomized trial with an embedded process evaluation;Implementation Science;2023-05-10