Author:
Heyrani Ali,Maleki Mohammadreza,Marnani Ahmad Barati,Ravaghi Hamid,Sedaghat Mojtaba,Jabbari Mosadegh,Farsi Davood,Khajavi Abdoljavad,Abdi Zhaleh
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Clinical governance (CG) is among the different frameworks proposed to improve the quality of healthcare. Iran, like many other countries, has put healthcare quality improvement in its top health policy priorities. In November 2009, implementation of CG became a task for all hospitals across the country. However, it has been a challenge to clarify the notion of CG and the way to implement it in Iran. The purpose of this action research study is to understand how CG can be defined and implemented in a selected teaching emergency department (ED).
Methods/design
We will use Soft Systems Methodology for both designing the study and inquiring into its content. As we considered a complex problem situation regarding the quality of care in the selected ED, we initially conceptualized CG as a cyclic set of purposeful activities designed to explore the situation and find relevant changes to improve the quality of care. Then, implementation of CG will conceptually be to carry out that set of purposeful activities. The activities will be about: understanding the situation and finding out relevant issues concerning the quality of care; exploring different stakeholders’ views and ideas about the situation and how it can be improved; and defining actions to improve the quality of care through structured debates and development of accommodations among stakeholders. We will flexibly use qualitative methods of data collection and analysis in the course of the study. To ensure the study rigor, we will use different strategies.
Discussion
Successful implementation of CG, like other quality improvement frameworks, requires special consideration of underlying complexities. We believe that addressing the complex situation and reflections on involvement in this action research will make it possible to understand the concept of CG and its implementation in the selected setting. By describing the context and executed flexible methods of implementation, the results of this study would contribute to the development of implementation science and be employed by boards and executives governing other clinical settings to facilitate CG implementation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Informatics,Health Policy,General Medicine
Reference64 articles.
1. Donabedian A: Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care. Milbank Q. 2005, 83 (4): 691-729. 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00397.x. reprinted article
2. Donabedian A: The quality of care: How can it be assessed?. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997, 121 (11): 1145-1150.
3. Lohr KN: Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance. 1990, National Academy Press, Washington D.C
4. Harteloh PP: The Meaning of Quality in Health Care: A Conceptual Analysis. Health Care Anal. 2003, 11 (3): 259-267.
5. World Health Organization: Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. 2006, WHO, Geneva
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献