Optimizing sobriety checkpoints to maximize public health benefits and minimize operational costs

Author:

Morrison Christopher N.,Gobaud Ariana N.,Mehranbod Christina A.,Bushover Brady R.,Branas Charles C.,Wiebe Douglas J.,Peek-Asa Corinne,Chen Qixuan,Ferris Jason

Abstract

Abstract Background Sobriety checkpoints are a highly effective strategy to reduce alcohol-impaired driving, but they are used infrequently in the USA. Recent evidence from observational studies suggests that using optimized sobriety checkpoints—operating for shorter duration with fewer officers—can minimize operational costs without reducing public health benefits. The aim of this research was to conduct a pilot study to test whether police can feasibly implement optimized sobriety checkpoints and whether researchers can examine optimized sobriety checkpoints compared to usual practice within a non-randomized controlled trial study design. Methods The study site was the Town of Apex, NC. We worked with Apex Police Department to develop a schedule of sobriety checkpoints during calendar year 2021 that comprised 2 control checkpoints (conducted according to routine practice) and 4 optimized checkpoints staffed by fewer officers. Our primary operations aim was to test whether police can feasibly implement optimized sobriety checkpoints. Our primary research aim was to identify barriers and facilitators for conducting an intervention study of optimized sobriety checkpoints compared to usual practice. A secondary aim was to assess motorist support for sobriety checkpoints and momentary stress while passing through checkpoints. Results Apex PD conducted 5 of the 6 checkpoints and reported similar operational capabilities and results during the optimized checkpoints compared to control checkpoints. For example, a mean of 4 drivers were investigated for possibly driving while impaired at the optimized checkpoints, compared to 2 drivers at control checkpoints. The field team conducted intercept surveys among 112 motorists at 4 of the 6 checkpoints in the trial schedule. The survey response rate was 11% from among 1,045 motorists who passed through these checkpoints. Over 90% of respondents supported sobriety checkpoints, and momentary stress during checkpoints was greater for motorists who reported consuming any alcohol in the last 90 days compared to nondrinkers (OR = 6.7, 95%CI: 1.6, 27.1). Conclusions Results of this study indicate the sobriety checkpoints can feasibly be optimized by municipal police departments, but it will be very difficult to assess the impacts of optimized checkpoints compared to usual practice using an experimental study design.

Funder

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

National Center for Injury Prevention and Control

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. 2009 Traffic Safety Culture Index. Washington, DC: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety; July 2009. 23 p. Available from: https://aaafoundation.org/2009-traffic-safety-culture-index.

2. Bergen G, Pitan A, Qu S, Shults RA, Chattopadhyay SK, Elder RW, et al. Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs: a community guide systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(5):529–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.018.

3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: CDC Newsroom. October 7, 2014. CDC report shows motor vehicle crash injuries are frequent and costly. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p1007-crash-injuries.html.

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sobriety Checkpoints 2015 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/calculator/factsheet/checkpoints.html.

5. Community Preventive Services Task Force. Publicized sobriety checkpoint programs to reduce alcohol-impaired driving: Recommendation of the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(5):540–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.019.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3