Interdisciplinary network care collaboration in Parkinson’s disease: a baseline evaluation in Germany
-
Published:2024-01-11
Issue:1
Volume:6
Page:
-
ISSN:2524-3489
-
Container-title:Neurological Research and Practice
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neurol. Res. Pract.
Author:
Lummer Carina, Eggers Carsten, Becker Andreas, Demandt Fenja, Warnecke TobiasORCID,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The strengthening of interdisciplinary care collaboration in Parkinson's disease is taking on increasing importance in daily medical routine. Therefore, care providers worldwide are organizing themselves in disease-specific regional network structures. However, the existing networks are heterogeneous, and the driving key players are yet unidentified.
Objectives
To systematically identify key factors of the composition of health care professionals, who are initially interested in the development of a Parkinson network for interdisciplinary care collaboration, their motivation, and expectations, we conducted a basic evaluation in three different German regions covering a total number of 23,405 people with Parkinson’s.
Methods
A specially developed semi-open questionnaire focusing on socio-demographic information, ways of contact, interdisciplinary collaboration, and connectedness was used. Statistical analyses were performed based on a predesigned codebook.
Results
The most crucial professions were outpatient therapists (physio-, occupational-, speech therapists) (36.7%), average case load of 10.1 patients/3 months and inpatient movement disorder specialists (21.1%), average case load of 197.4 patients/3 months. Before implementation of PD networks, 48.9% of outpatient therapists did not have any contact with neurologists. 58.9% of caregivers considered the current frequency of collaboration to be insufficient. The lack of political support as well as a lack of time were identified as main hurdles to increased collaboration.
Conclusion
The identified driving forces in strengthened care collaboration are assigned to different healthcare sectors. This makes networks which provide tools for specialized education and interdisciplinary, cross-sectoral communication indispensable. For an areawide rollout, a rethinking of political frameworks towards network care is strongly necessary.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Poewe, W., Seppi, K., Tanner, C. M., Halliday, G. M., Brundin, P., Volkmann, J., Schrag, A. E., & Lang, A. E. (2017). Parkinson’s disease. Nature reviews. Disease Primers, 3, 17013. 2. Bloem, B. R., Okun, M. S., & Klein, C. (2021). Parkinson’s Disease. Lancet (London, England), 397(10291), 2284–2303. 3. Rizzo, G., Copetti, M., Arcuti, S., Martino, D., Fontana, A., & Logroscino, G. (2016). Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology, 86, 566–576. 4. Ypinga, J., de Vries, N. M., Boonen, L., Koolman, X., Munneke, M., Zwinderman, A. H., & Bloem, B. R. (2018). Effectiveness and costs of specialised physiotherapy given via ParkinsonNet: A retrospective analysis of medical claims data. The Lancet. Neurology, 17(2), 153–161. 5. Rajan, R., Brennan, L., Bloem, B. R., Dahodwala, N., Gardner, J., Goldman, J. G., Grimes, D. A., Iansek, R., Kovács, N., McGinley, J., Parashos, S. A., Piemonte, M., & Eggers, C. (2020). Integrated care in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Movement Disorders, 35(9), 1509–1531.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Multidisciplinary care in Parkinson’s disease;Journal of Neural Transmission;2024-07-23
|
|