User expectations and experiences of an assistive robotic arm in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a multicenter observational study
-
Published:2024-08-23
Issue:1
Volume:6
Page:
-
ISSN:2524-3489
-
Container-title:Neurological Research and Practice
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neurol. Res. Pract.
Author:
Spittel SusanneORCID, Meyer ThomasORCID, Weyen Ute, Grehl Torsten, Weydt Patrick, Steinbach RobertORCID, Petri Susanne, Baum Petra, Metelmann Moritz, Sperfeld Anne-Dorte, Kettemann Dagmar, Norden Jenny, Rödiger Annekathrin, Ilse Benjamin, Grosskreutz Julian, Hildebrandt Barbara, Walter Bertram, Münch Christoph, Maier AndréORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Robotic arms are innovative assistive devices for ALS patients with progressive motor deficits of arms and hands. The objective was to explore the patients´ expectations towards a robotic arm system and to assess the actual experiences after the provision of the device.
Methods
A prospective observational study was conducted at 9 ALS centers in Germany. ALS-related functional deficits were assessed using the ALS-Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). Motor deficit of the upper limbs was determined using a subscore of three arm-related items of the ALSFRS-R (items 4–6; range 0–12 points). User expectations before provision (expectation group, n = 85) and user experiences after provision (experience group, n = 14) with the device (JACO Assistive Robotic Device, Kinova, Boisbriand, QC, Canada) were assessed.
Results
In the total cohort, mean ALSFRS-R subscore for arm function was 1.7 (SD: 2.0, 0–9) demonstrating a severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. In the expectation group (n = 85), the following use cases of the robotic arm have been prioritized: handling objects (89%), close-body movements (88%), pressing buttons (87%), serving drinks (86%), and opening cabinets and doors (85%). In the experience group (n = 14), handling objects (79%), serving drinks (79%), near-body movements (71%), pushing buttons (71%), serving food (64%), and opening doors (64%) were the most frequent used cases. Most patients used the device daily (71.4%, n = 10), and 28.6% (n = 4) several times a week. All patients of the experience group found the device helpful, felt safe while using the device, and were satisfied with its reliability. NPS of the assistive robotic arm revealed 64% "promoters" (strong recommendation), 29% "indifferents" (uncertain recommendation) and 7% "detractors" (no recommendation). Total NPS was + 57 demonstrating strong patient satisfaction.
Conclusions
Initiation of procurement with a robotic assistive arm was confined to patients with severe functional deficit of the upper limbs. User experience underlined the wide spectrum of use cases of assistive robotic arms in ALS. The positive user experience together with high satisfaction underscore that robotic arm systems serve as a valuable treatment option in ALS patients with severe motor deficits of the arms.
Funder
Kinova Europe GmbH Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Hardiman, O., van den Berg, L. H., & Kiernan, M. C. (2011). Clinical diagnosis and management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nature Reviews Neurology, 7(11), 639–649. 2. Maier, A., Eicher, C., Kiselev, J., Klebbe, R., Greuèl, M., Kettemann, D., et al. (2021). Acceptance of enhanced robotic assistance systems in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-associated motor impairment: Observational online study. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 8(4), e18972. 3. de Wit, J., Bakker, L. A., van Groenestijn, A. C., van den Berg, L. H., Schröder, C. D., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., et al. (2018). Caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 32(1), 231–245. 4. Funke, A., Spittel, S., Grehl, T., Grosskreutz, J., Kettemann, D., Petri, S., et al. (2018). Provision of assistive technology devices among people with ALS in Germany: A platform-case management approach. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener., 19(5–6), 342–350. 5. Connors, K., Mahony, L., & Morgan, P. (2019). Variation in assistive technology use in motor neuron disease according to clinical phenotypes and ALS functional rating scale - revised score: A prospective observational study. NeuroRehabilitation, 44(2), 303–313.
|
|