Author:
Narayana Soumya,Gowda B.H. Jaswanth,Hani Umme,Shimu Sharmin Sultana,Paul Karthika,Das Avinaba,Ashique Sumel,Ahmed Mohammed Gulzar,Tarighat Maryam Abbasi,Abdi Gholamreza
Abstract
AbstractColorectal cancer, the third most prevalent cancer globally, contributes significantly to mortality rates, with over 1.9 million reported cases and nearly 935,000 fatalities annually. Surgical resection is a primary approach for localized colorectal tumors, with adjunct therapies like chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted/immunotherapy considered depending on the tumor stage. However, despite preferences for targeted and immunotherapy post-surgery, chemotherapy remains commonly chosen due to its lower cost and high cancer-killing efficiency. Yet, chemotherapy faces issues such as tumor resistance and severe side effects. Nanotechnology has emerged in cancer therapy by alleviating the drawbacks of current treatment approaches. In the past few decades, inorganic nanoparticles have shown promise in combating colorectal cancer, offering advantages over conventional chemotherapy. Compared to organic nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles exhibit properties like photosensitivity, conductivity, magnetic allure, and thermal proficiency, allowing them to function as both drug carriers and therapeutic agents. Derived primarily from carbon, silica, metals, and metal oxides, they offer superior drug-loading capacity, heightened quantum yield, and participation in advanced photothermal and photodynamic therapies. This review provides a brief overview of the pathophysiology of colorectal cancer and the pivotal role of inorganic nanoparticles in photothermal therapy photodynamic therapy, and drug delivery. Additionally, it discusses numerous inorganic nanoparticles in colorectal cancer therapy based on recent literature.
Graphical abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference183 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Apr 14];71:209–49. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33538338/.
2. Ashique S, Kumar S, Hussain A, Mishra N, Garg A, Gowda BHJ et al. A narrative review on the role of magnesium in immune regulation, inflammation, infectious diseases, and cancer. J Health Popul Nutr [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 8];42:74. https://jhpn.biomedcentral.com/articles/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-023-00423-0.
3. Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Mar 27];394:1467–80. http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673619323190/fulltext.
4. Sharma R, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Rabu R, Abidi H, Abu-Gharbieh E, Acuna JM et al. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Mar 27];7:627–47. http://www.thelancet.com/article/S2468125322000449/fulltext.
5. Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2024 Mar 27];325:1978–97. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34003220/.