Abstract
Abstract
Background
The nucleus, besides its functions in the gene maintenance and regulation, plays a significant role in the cell mechanosensitivity and mechanotransduction. It is the largest cellular organelle that is often considered as the stiffest cell part as well. Interestingly, the previous studies have revealed that the nucleus might be dispensable for some of the cell properties, like polarization and 1D and 2D migration. Here, we studied how the nanomechanical properties of cells, as measured using nanomechanical mapping by atomic force microscopy (AFM), were affected by the removal of the nucleus.
Methods
The mass enucleation procedure was employed to obtain cytoplasts (enucleated cells) and nucleoplasts (nuclei surrounded by plasma membrane) of two cell lines, REF52 fibroblasts and HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells. High-resolution viscoelastic mapping by AFM was performed to compare the mechanical properties of normal cells, cytoplasts, and nucleoplast. The absence or presence of the nucleus was confirmed with fluorescence microscopy, and the actin cytoskeleton structure was assessed with confocal microscopy.
Results
Surprisingly, we did not find the softening of cytoplasts relative to normal cells, and even some degree of stiffening was discovered. Nucleoplasts, as well as the nuclei isolated from cells using a detergent, were substantially softer than both the cytoplasts and normal cells.
Conclusions
The cell can maintain its mechanical properties without the nucleus. Together, the obtained data indicate the dominating role of the actomyosin cytoskeleton over the nucleus in the cell mechanics at small deformations inflicted by AFM.
Funder
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
Council on grants of the President of the Russian Federation
Russian Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmaceutical Science,Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,Biomedical Engineering,Molecular Medicine,Medicine (miscellaneous),Bioengineering
Reference51 articles.
1. Dahl KN, Ribeiro AJS, Lammerding J. Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction. Circ Res. 2008;102:1307–18.
2. Martins R, Finan J, Guilak F, Lee D. Mechanical regulation of nuclear structure and function. Annu. Rev. 2012;14:431–55.
3. Stephens AD, Banigan EJ, Marko JF. Chromatin’s physical properties shape the nucleus and its functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019;58:76–84.
4. Lele TP, Dickinson RB, Gundersen GG. Mechanical principles of nuclear shaping and positioning. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:3330–42.
5. Lombardi ML, Lammerding J. Altered mechanical properties of the nucleus in disease. Methods Cell Biol. 2010;98:121–41.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献