Abstract
AbstractWe explore the effects of chief executive officers’ (CEOs’) personal dominance—an idiosyncratic character trait strongly associated with a desire for influence and control—on two fundamental organizational design decisions: the CEO’s span of control (1) and her delegation of responsibilities as reflected in the appointment of a chief operating officer (COO) (2). Linking three original measures of CEO dominance based on quarterly earnings calls with manually collected data on span of control and COO positions for a sample of CEOs presiding over large US corporations, we demonstrate that CEOs who are high in dominance have a significantly larger personal span of control and delegate fewer decision rights than less-dominant CEOs. We discuss implications of our findings and future questions from an organizational design perspective.
Funder
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference120 articles.
1. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Lelarge C, Van Reenen J, Zilibotti F (2007) Technology, information and the decentralization of the firm. Q J Econ 5:1759–1799
2. Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J Polit Econ 105(1):1–29
3. Aghion P, Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2014) Incomplete contracts and the internal organization of firms. J Law Econ Organ 30:37–63
4. Alcock J (1989) Animal behavior. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
5. Amit R, Livnat J (1988) Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Acad Manag J 31(1):154–166
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献