Abstract
Abstract
Background
Peripheral neuropathy is not only the most prevalent consequence of diabetes but also the main reason for foot ulceration, disability, and amputation. Therefore, the current study aims to determine the effectiveness of oral clonidine and gabapentin on peripheral neuropathy in diabetic patients.
Methods
This 12-week, randomized, and parallel-group trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine and gabapentin with gabapentin alone in diabetic patients in southwest Iran during the first half of 2021. Thirty patients with type 2 diabetes with peripheral neuropathy as assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) and divided into two groups of 15 patients, treated for up to three months. The data were analyzed using SPSS-21 software. In order to report the results, descriptive indices, independent t-test, one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and analysis of variance with repeated measures were used.
Results
The mean and standard deviation of the age of the participants in the clonidine + gabapentin group was equal to 50.20 ± 7.44, and in the gabapentin group was equal to 50.47 ± 7.57 (t = 0.10, P-value = 0.923). This research showed a significant difference between the clonidine + gabapentin group and with gabapentin group in terms of neuropathic pain and the severity of neuropathic pain (P < 0.001).
Conclusions
According to this research results, clonidine + gabapentin can reduce neuropathic pain and the severity of neuropathic pain in diabetic patients. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare professionals with diabetes expertise prescribe these medications to reduce neuropathic pain and its severity.
Trial registration
This study was registered in the Iranian Clinical Trials System with the ID (IRCT20211106052983N1) on 14/01/2022.
Funder
Yasuj University of Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Medicine,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Reference59 articles.
1. American Diabetes A. Diagnosis and classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):67–74. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc13-s067.
2. Khursheed R, Singh SK, Wadhwa S, Kapoor B, Gulati M, Kumar R et al. Treatment strategies against diabetes: Success so far and challenges ahead. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;862(2019):172625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172625.
3. Ashish A, Shah A, Pandey SS. Interaction between oxidative stress and Diabetes: a mini-review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;7(2):58–61. https://www.academia.edu/download/65075718/8_Interaction_between_oxidative_stress_and_diabetes.pdf.
4. Bekele H, Asefa A, Getachew B, Belete AM. Barriers and strategies to lifestyle and dietary pattern interventions for prevention and management of TYPE-2 diabetes in Africa, systematic review. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7948712.
5. Javanbakht M, Mashayekhi A, Baradaran HR, Haghdoost A, Afshin A. Projection of Diabetes population size and associated economic burden through 2030 in Iran: evidence from micro-simulation Markov model and bayesian meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):0132505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132505.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献