Author:
Roberts Nicola J,Smith Susan F,Partridge Martyn R
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Use of spirometry is essential for the accurate diagnosis of respiratory disease but it is underused in both primary and specialist care. In the current study, we have explored the reasons for this underuse.
Methods
Five separate focus groups were undertaken with final year medical undergraduates, junior hospital doctors, general practitioners (GPs) and specialist trainees in respiratory medicine. The participants were not told prior to the session that we were specifically interested in their views about spirometry but discussion was moderated to elicit their approaches to the diagnosis of a breathless patient, their use of investigations and their learning preferences.
Results
Undergraduates and junior doctors rarely had a systematic approach towards the breathless patient and tended, unless prompted, to focus on the emergency room situation rather than on patients with longer term causes of breathlessness. Whilst their theoretical knowledge embraced the possibility of a non-respiratory cause for breathlessness, neither undergraduates nor junior doctors spontaneously mentioned the use of spirometry in the diagnosis of respiratory disease. When prompted they cited lack of familiarity with the use and location of equipment, and lack of encouragement to use it as being major barriers to utilization. In contrast, GPs and specialist respiratory trainees were enthusiastic about its use and perceived spirometry as a core element of the diagnostic workup.
Conclusions
More explicit training is needed regarding the role of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of those with lung disease and this necessitates both practical experience and training in interpretation of the data. However, formal teaching is likely to be undermined in practice, if the concept is not strongly promoted by the senior staff who act as role models and trainers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Hamers R, Bontemps S, van den AM, Souza R, Penaforte J, Chavannes N: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Brazilian primary care: Diagnostic competence and case-finding. Prim Care Respir J. 2006, 15 (5): 299-306. 10.1016/j.pcrj.2006.07.008.
2. Fauzi A: Knowledge and practice of medical doctors on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a preliminary survey from a state hospital. Med J Malaysia. 2003, 58 (2): 205-212.
3. Alvarez Luque I, Flor Escriche X, Rodriguez Mas M, Gallego Alvarez L, Fraga Martinez M, Sanchez Pinacho L, et al: Do we forget asthma as a chronic illness in our primary care consultations?. Aten Primaria. 2004, 33: 381-386. 10.1157/13060756.
4. Zaas D, Wise R, Wiener C: Airway Obstruction Is Common but Unsuspected in Patients Admitted to a General Medicine Service. Chest. 2004, 125 (1): 106-111. 10.1378/chest.125.1.106.
5. Volkova NB, Kodani A, Hilario D, Munyaradzi SM, Peterson MW: Spirometry utilization after hospitalization for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations. Am J Med Qual. 2009, 24 (1): 61-66.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献