Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pseudomyxoma peritonei is an infrequent condition with a global annual incidence of only one to two cases per million people. Mucinous neoplasms, widespread intraperitoneal implants, and mucinous ascites characterize it. Currently, most clinicians misdiagnose this condition, which leads to delayed management.
Case presentation
A 44-year-old North Indian female presented with a 1.5-month history of an abdominal lump. Physical examination revealed a sizeable abdominopelvic mass at 36 weeks. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a massive multiloculated right ovarian cystic mass measuring 28 × 23 × 13 cm with mild ascites and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels (113.75 ng/ml). A provisional diagnosis of ovarian mucinous neoplasm was made, for which the patient underwent laparotomy. Intraoperatively, there were gross mucinous ascites, along with a large, circumscribed, ruptured right ovarian tumor filled with gelatinous material. The appendicular lump was also filled with mucinous material along with the omentum, ascending colon, right lateral aspect of the rectum, splenic surface, and small bowel mesentery. Cytoreductive surgery was performed along with an oncosurgeon, including total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoophorectomy, omentectomy, right hemicolectomy, lower anterior resection, ileo-transverse stapled anastomosis with proximal ileal loop diversion stoma, excision of multiple peritoneal gelatinous implants, and peritoneal lavage. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of intestinal-type mucinous carcinoma. Postoperatively, the patient was given six cycles of chemotherapy. She tolerated it without any specific morbidity and had an uneventful recovery. Postoperative follow-up at 15 months revealed normal tumor marker levels and abdominal computed tomography findings and no signs suggestive of local recurrence or distal metastases.
Conclusions
Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease that is frequently misdiagnosed in the preoperative phase. Therefore, radiologists and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary management.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. de Oliveira AM, Rodrigues CG, Borges A, Martins A, dos Santos SL, Rocha Pires F, et al. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a clinical case of this poorly understood condition. Int J Gen Med. 2014;7:137–41.
2. Mohfouz A, Hamed M, Patel A, Tasnim S, Shah P. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a case report of a 62-year-old female with unexplained abdominal enlargement and appendiceal origin. Cureus. 2022;14:2–5.
3. Mathur S, Kelly E. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: a case report of an incidental finding at cesarean section. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2016;5:32–6.
4. Sarpietro G, Iraci Sareri M, Bonanno GM, Matarazzo MG, Cianci A. Incidental diagnosis of pseudomyxoma peritonei: a case report. Cureus. 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23425.
5. García KM, Flores KM, Ruiz A, González FL, Rodríguez ÁM. Pseudomyxoma peritonei: case report and literature review. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019;50:1037–42.