Assessing the relative importance of key quality of life dimensions for people with and without a disability: an empirical ranking comparison study

Author:

Crocker MatthewORCID,Hutchinson ClaireORCID,Mpundu-Kaambwa ChristineORCID,Walker RuthORCID,Chen GangORCID,Ratcliffe JulieORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background In economic evaluation, the quality of life of people with a disability has traditionally been assessed using preference-based instruments designed to measure and value quality of life. To provide robust measurement of the effectiveness of programs designed to improve the quality of life of people living with a disability, preference-based measures need to be sufficiently sensitive to detect incremental changes in the quality of life dimensions that are most important to people who have a disability. This study sought to explore whether there was a difference in the ranked order of importance of quality of life dimensions between people with a disability and people without a disability. Methods An online survey was developed and administered Australia wide. The first sample (n = 410) comprised adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with a disability (n = 208) and family carers of person/s with a disability who were asked to respond on behalf of the person with a disability (n = 202). The second sample included adults without disability (n = 443). Respondents were asked to rank the importance of 12 quality of life dimensions extracted from the content of established preference-based quality of life measures (EQ-5D, AQoL and ASCOT). Results People with a disability placed relatively higher importance on broader quality of life dimensions (e.g. Control, Independence, Self-care) relative to health status focused dimensions (e.g. Vision, Hearing, Physical mobility). This distinction was less differentiable for those ‘without a disability’. The biggest differences in ranked importance of dimensions were in: Vision (‘with disability’ = 10th, ‘without disability’ = 4th), Self-care (‘with disability’ = 3rd, ‘without disability’ = 7th) and Mental well-being (‘with disability’ = 6th, ‘without disability’ = 2nd). Conclusions The relative importance of quality of life dimensions for people with a disability differs to people without a disability. Quality of life is a key outcome for economic evaluation and for assessing the impact of disability care policy and practice in Australia and internationally. It is important that the effectiveness of interventions is measured and valued in ways which are fully reflective of the quality of life preferences of people with a disability.

Funder

school of nursing and midwifery, flinders university

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Mavromaras K, Moskos M, Mahuteau S, Isherwood L, Goode A, Walton H, et al. Evaluation of the NDIS [Internet]. 2018 Apr [cited 2021 May 21]. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2018/04/apo-nid143516-1215586.pdf.

2. Dickinson H, Glasby J. The personalisation agenda: Implications for the third sector, Third Sector Research Centre [Internet]. Working paper 30. 2010 [cited 2021 Jun 9]. http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/795/.

3. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Saloman J, Tsuchiya A. Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation—John Brazier; Julie Ratcliffe; Joshua Saloman; Aki Tsuchiya—Oxford University Press [Internet]. Second. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007 [cited 2021 Jun 9]. https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=r3R4DQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=y08TvVQF1j&sig=5LIDlvUqYXEqwsn8rz_AA42DYPs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.

4. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ. 1986;5(1):1–30.

5. Pequeno NP, de Araújo Cabral NL, Marchioni DM, Lima SC, de Oliveira Lyra C. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):1–13.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3