Abstract
Abstract
Background
The critical MFC design challenge is to increase anode surface area. A novel FAB–MFC integrated system was developed and evaluated for domestic wastewater treatment. It was operated in fed-batch flow mode at 1–3 days of HRT with 755 mg/L CODIN and 0.76 kg-COD/m3/day. The study includes anaerobic-MFC and aerobic-MFC integrated systems. Microbial electrode jacket dish (MEJ-dish) with hybrid dimension (HD) was invented, first time to authors’ knowledge, to boost anode biofilm growth. The treatment system with MEJ+ (FAB) and MEJ− (MFC) anode are called FAB–MFC and MFC, respectively.
Results
Fragmented variable anode biofilm thickness was observed in FAB than MFC. The FAB–MFC (FAB+) simple technique increases the anode biofilm thickness by ~ 5 times MFC. Due to HD the anode biofilm was fragmented in FAB+ system than MFC. At the end of each treatment cycle, voltage drops. All FAB+ integrated systems reduced voltage drop relative to MFC. FAB reduces voltage drops better than MFC in anaerobic-MFC from 6 to 20 mV and aerobic-MFC from 35–47 mV at 1 kΩ external load. The highest power density was achieved by FAB in anaerobic-MFC (FAB = 104 mW/m2, MFC = 98 mW/m2) and aerobic-MFC integrated system (FAB = 59 mW/m2, MFC = 42 mW/m2).
Conclusions
The ∆COD and CE between FAB and MFC could not be concluded because both setups were inserted in the same reactor. The integrated system COD removal (78–97%) was higher than the solitary MFC treatment (68–78%). This study findings support the FAB+ integrated system could be applied for real applications and improve performance. However, it might depend on influent COD, the microbial nature, and ∆COD in FAB+ and MFC, which requires further study.
Graphic abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Biomedical Engineering,Food Science,Biotechnology
Reference72 articles.
1. Abbassi R, Yadav AK, Khan F, Garaniya V (2020) Integrated microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment. Butterworth-Heinemann, MA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03157-9
2. Ahn Y, Logan BE (2010) Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 101:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.039
3. Angelaalincy MJ, Navanietha Krishnaraj R, Shakambari G, Ashokkumar B, Kathiresan S, Varalakshmi P (2018) Biofilm engineering approaches for improving the performance of
microbial fuel cells and bioelectrochemical systems Frontiers in Energy Research 6:63. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2018.00063
4. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edn. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington DC, USA
5. Arbianti R, Utami TS, Leondo V, Putri AS, Hermansyah H (2018) Effect of biofilm and selective mixed culture on microbial fuel cell for the treatment of tempeh industrial wastewater MS&E 316:012073. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/316/1/012073
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献