Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study investigated the scoring and criterion-related validity of the TEAP, a newly developed Test of English for Academic Purposes. In this study, scoring validity was examined by investigating the factor structure, while criterion-related validity was examined by first investigating the longitudinal change of test takers’ perceived test task value toward the measured construct and then investigating the relationship of test takers’ perceived value to the factor structure of the TEAP.
Methods
Confirmatory item-level factor analysis was conducted using the data obtained from 2217 first-year university students comparing four models (unitary, correlated, receptive-productive, higher order). Additional confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to first investigate the longitudinal change of perceived value toward the measured construct and then to investigate the relationship of test takers’ perceived value of the construct measured by the test to the factor structure of the TEAP.
Results
The results show that the higher-order model was the best-fitting model. This confirmed a previous small-scale study suggesting the generalizability of the test’s factor structure. Furthermore, it was found that test takers’ perceived values measured at the start of university positively affected the values measured about 6 months later.
In addition, perceived values measured both at the start of university study and about 6 months later positively correlated with the higher-order factor of the test.
Conclusions
The results provide further support of the scoring validity of the test. In addition, a positive relationship between the higher-order factor of TEAP and the factors of perceived values provide evidence of the usefulness of test takers’ perception to further support the criterion-related validity of the test.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference45 articles.
1. Allen, D. (2020). Proposing change in university entrance examinations: A tale of two metaphors. TEVAL - Shiken: A Journal of Language Testing and Evaluation in Japan, 24(2), 23–38.
2. Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. (1981). The construct validation of the FSI oral interview. Language Learning, 31(1), 67–77.
3. Benesse. (2022). GTEC CBT. http://www.benesse-gtec.com/cbt/en. Accessed 11 May 2022.
4. British Council, IDP, IELTS Australia, & Cambridge English Language Assessment (2022). IELTS. http://www.ielts.org/. Accessed 11 May 2022.
5. Byrne, B. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York: Routledge.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献