Abstract
Abstract
Background
Variations in the skill profiles of learners have become an important research area in recent years. However, there is a lack of empirical research on this topic in Japan. We conducted three studies to address this gap.
Methods
Study 1 investigated the characteristics of the flat and uneven skill profiles of Japanese learners of English using 10 datasets from five standardized four-skill second-language English proficiency tests. Studies 2 and 3 examined the reasons behind learners having these uneven profiles using a convergent mixed-methods approach (Creswell & Plano Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2018) that consisted of a questionnaire and an interview, respectively.
Results
The results of Study 1 suggested that a flat profile is uncommon, and that various types of uneven profiles exist across datasets. The most frequently observed uneven profiles were as follows: (a) listening, speaking, and writing are lower than reading (LSW<R); (b) speaking and writing are lower than listening and reading (SW<LR); and (c) speaking is lower than the other three skills (S<LRW). The results of Studies 2 and 3 suggested three key reasons, namely, (a) insufficient practice, (b) particular subskills or processes required to accomplish test tasks, and (c) unfamiliarity with test formats and test-taking environments.
Conclusions
The results demonstrated the importance of considering uneven skill profiles in L2 research and practice. These results have implications for test development, admission, placement, and pedagogy. For example, skill profile information can benefit admission and placement officers when they make a decision and can aid teachers and administrators in planning remedial instructions.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference54 articles.
1. Benesse Educational Research and Development Institute. (2016). Chuko no eigo shidou ni kansuru jittai chosa 2015. [Field survey on English education at junior and senior high schools, 2015]. https://berd.benesse.jp/up_images/research/Eigo_Shido_all.pdf.
2. Bridgeman, B., Cho, Y., & DiPietro, S. (2016). Predicting grades from an English language assessment: The importance of peeling the onion. Language Testing, 33(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215583066.
3. Center for Entrance Examination Standardization. (2017). GTEC sukoa to CEFR reberu kanrenduke chosa hokoku [Standard setting study of relating GTEC scores with CEFR levels]. https://www.benesse.co.jp/gtec/schoolofficials/research/.
4. Choi, I. (2017). Empirical profiles of academic oral English proficiency from an international teaching assistant screening test. Language Testing, 34(1), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215601881.
5. Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献