Abstract
AbstractThis study proposed an innovative automated approach to differentiation of the vocabulary proficiency of Chinese speakers. A robust K-means algorithm was designed to compare the oral proficiency between L1 and L2 Chinese speakers regarding lexical richness and how relatively effective the various lexical measures were in performing the differentiation task. Eighteen lexical richness measures were surveyed and compared using the clustering analysis. The effectiveness of each selected measure as well as an overall evaluation of all the measures for the concerned differentiation tasks were comprehensively calibrated. The results demonstrate that, while the L1 versus L2 group difference in lexical richness was observed with statistical significance for each of the chosen measures, the clustering and membership prediction accuracy of individual speakers varied greatly from one measure to another. The implication is that a more fully defined metric of lexical richness is still a worthwhile endeavor for language proficiency assessment, with optimal directions for such endeavors discussed in the concluding remarks.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference56 articles.
1. Akiyama, Y., & Saito, K. (2016). Development of comprehensibility and its linguistic correlates: a longitudinal study of video-mediated telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 585–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12338.
2. Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34.
3. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary and knowledge. In J. T. Gutrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research review, (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4. Beglar, D., & Nation, P. (2013). Assessing vocabulary. The Companion to Language Assessment, 2(10), 72–184.
5. Bosker, H. R., Quene, H., Sanders, T., & de Jong, N. H. (2014). The perception of fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 64(3), 579–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12067.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献