Abstract
Abstract
Background
Acute cannabis use has been demonstrated to slow reaction time and affect decision-making and short-term memory. These effects may have utility in identifying impairment associated with recent use. However, these effects have not been widely investigated among individuals with a pattern of daily use, who may have acquired tolerance. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of tolerance to cannabis on the acute effects as measured by reaction time, decision-making (gap acceptance), and short-term memory.
Methods
Participants (ages 25–45) completed a tablet-based (iPad) test battery before and approximately 60 min after smoking cannabis flower. The change in performance from before to after cannabis use was compared across three groups of cannabis users: (1) occasional use (n = 23); (2) daily use (n = 31); or (3) no current use (n = 32). Participants in the occasional and daily use group self-administered ad libitum, by smoking or vaping, self-supplied cannabis flower with a high concentration of total THC (15–30%).
Results
The occasional use group exhibited decrements in reaction time (slowed) and short-term memory (replicated fewer shapes) from before to after cannabis use, as compared to the no-use group. In the gap acceptance task, daily use participants took more time to complete the task post-smoking cannabis as compared to those with no use or occasional use; however, the level of accuracy did not significantly change.
Conclusions
The findings are consistent with acquired tolerance to certain acute psychomotor effects with daily cannabis use. The finding from the gap acceptance task which showed a decline in speed but not accuracy may indicate a prioritization of accuracy over response time. Cognitive and psychomotor assessments may have utility for identifying impairment associated with recent cannabis use.
Funder
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Adam JJ. Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics. 1999;42(2):327–35.
2. Arkell TR, Spindle TR, Kevin RC, Vandrey R, McGregor IS. The failings of per se limits to detect cannabis-induced driving impairment: results from a simulated driving study. Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(2):102–7.
3. Asbridge M, Hayden JA, Cartwright JL. Acute cannabis consumption and motor vehicle collision risk: systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e536.
4. Bakhtiari R, Tomczak MV, Langor S, Scanlon JE, Granley A, Singhal A. Application of tablet-based cognitive tasks to predict unsafe drivers in older adults. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020;4:100105.
5. Blough PM, Slavin LK. Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performance. Percept Psychophys. 1987;41(3):276–81.