Let’s talk about it: an exploration of the comparative use of three different digital platforms to gather patient-reported outcome measures

Author:

Golden Anna Hundt,Gabriel Meghan Hufstader,Russo Jon,Price Mark,Ruhmel StephenORCID,Nilsson Ami,Delong Patricia Shepherd,Jelsma Jennifer,Carty Michelle

Abstract

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures provide valuable evidence in clinical trials; however, poor compliance with PRO measures is a notable and long-standing problem, resulting in missing data that potentially impact the interpretation of trial results. Interactive, patient-centric platforms may increase participants’ motivation to complete PRO measures over the course of a clinical trial. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and optimize the usability of 3 popular consumer technologies—a traditional app-based interface, a chatbot interface, and a speech-operated interface—that may be used to improve user engagement and compliance with PRO measures. Methods Participants aged 18–75 years from the general United States population tested the usability of 3 ePRO platforms: a traditional app-based interface using Datacubed Health Platform (Datacubed), a web-based chatbot interface using the Orbita platform, and a speech-operated Alexa interface using an Alexa Skill called “My Daily Wellness.” The usability of these platforms was tested with 2 PRO measures: the EQ-5D-5 L and the SF-12v2 Health Survey (SF-12v2), Daily recall. Using a crossover design, 3 cohorts of participants tested each ePRO platform daily for 1 week. After testing, interviews were conducted regarding the participants’ experience with each platform. Results A total of 24 adults participated in the study. The mean age of participants was 45 years (range, 21–71 years), and half were female (n = 12; 50%). Overall, participants prioritized speed, ease of use, and device portability in selecting their preferred platform. The Datacubed app met these criteria and was the preferred platform among most participants (n = 20; 83%). Participants also suggested various modifications to the platforms, such as programmable notifications, adjustable speed, and additional daily reminders. Conclusions These data demonstrate the importance of speed, ease of use, and device portability, features that are currently incorporated in the Datacubed app, in ePRO platforms used in future clinical trials. Additionally, the usability of ePRO platforms may be optimized by adding programmable notifications, adjustable speed, and increased daily reminders. The results of this study may be used to enhance the usability and patient centricity of these platforms to improve user compliance and engagement during clinical trials.

Funder

Janssen Research and Development

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics

Reference34 articles.

1. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. In (2016) BEST (biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Food and Drug Administration, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

2. US Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims (2009) https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims. Accessed April 13, 2023

3. European Medicines Agency. Appendix 2 to the guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man: the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies (2016) https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/appendix-2-guideline-evaluation-anticancer-medicinal-products-man_en.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2023

4. Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Calvert MJ et al (2018) The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 9:353–367. https://doi.org/10.2147/prom.S156279

5. Mercieca-Bebber R, Friedlander M, Calvert M et al (2017) A systematic evaluation of compliance and reporting of patient-reported outcome endpoints in Ovarian cancer randomised controlled trials: implications for generalisability and clinical practice. J Patient Rep Outcomes 1(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-017-0008-3

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3