Abstract
Abstract
Objective
This study compares clinical pain outcomes between patients in a pain treatment program that received a Fitbit, to patients that did not. We also explored: (1) cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors that may have impacted the decision to opt in to receiving a Fitbit; and (2) whether the choice to receive a Fitbit impacted changes in cognitive, emotional, and psychological factors following treatment.
Methods
Among 58 patients in a multidisciplinary pain treatment program at a Veterans Affairs Healthcare System hospital, 31 patients opted to receive a Fitbit as adjunct treatment, while 27 did not. This study utilized patient-reported and practitioner-collected data from the pain treatment program.
Results
Compared to the non-Fitbit group, the Fitbit group displayed a significant decrease in average pain intensity, however showed no correlation between Fitbit activity and average pain intensity. Additionally, treatment satisfaction was the only predictor of treatment group, when modeling pre- and post-treatment outcomes changes.
Conclusion
The implementation of a Fitbit may lead to improved pain intensity. Initial evidence suggests that opting to receive a Fitbit during a pain treatment program indicates treatment engagement leading to greater treatment satisfaction. Future work is needed to verify and expand upon this potential mechanism.
Funder
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Schappert SM, Burt CW (2006) Ambulatory care visits to physician offices, hospital outpatient departments, and emergency departments: United States, 2001-02. Vital Health Stat 13(159):1–66
2. Gatchel RJ, Peng YB, Peters ML, Fuchs PN, Turk DC (2007) The biopsychosocial approach to chronic pain: scientific advances and future directions. Psychol Bull 133(4):581–624
3. Dueñas M, Ojeda B, Salazar A, Mico JA, Failde I (2016) A review of chronic pain impact on patients, their social environment and the health care system. J Pain Res 9:457–467
4. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration. VHA Directive 2009-053: Pain Management (2009) https://www.va.gov/painmanagement/docs/vha09paindirective.pdf (accessed December 2021)
5. Murphy JL, Palyo SA, Schmidt ZS et al (2021) The resurrection of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: outcomes across a veterans affairs collaborative. Pain Med 22(2):430–443