Abstract
Abstract
Background
In the simulation community, colleagues who are no longer clinically practicing were often proximal to the COVID-19 response, not working in the frontlines of patient care. At the same time, their work as simulationists changed dramatically or was halted. This research explored the experiences of those simulationists who have clinical backgrounds but did not provide direct patient care during the initial pandemic response. The aim of this study was to allow those simulationists to share and have their stories heard.
Methods
This qualitative research used a narrative approach to answer the research question: What were the experiences of those in the simulation community who did not contribute to the frontline patient care response during the early stages of the pandemic? A semi-structured questionnaire aimed at eliciting a story was disseminated through online simulation discussion boards. Data was collected through PHONIC with options to type or speak responses. Responses were analyzed using an inductive analytical process to identify themes or patterns in the narratives.
Results
Thirty-six respondents completed the survey between August 1, 2020 and November 30, 2020. Narrative arcs were identified that illustrated the events, actions, thoughts and feelings representative of experiences shared by many simulationists. Two major themes emerged: Challenges and Opportunities. Challenges included feelings of guilt; frustration; overwhelmed, stressed and exhausted; being away from the action, being unused and underappreciated. Opportunities included leadership (evolution and innovation), personal development, and being a part of something.
Conclusions
The findings reflect a snapshot in time of how simulation was viewed and used in the world during a pandemic through the personal stories of simulationists with clinical backgrounds who did not provide direct patient care. Sharing these narratives may inform future simulation development; however, it is vitally important that the emotions are recognized and acknowledged. Managers should ensure mental health resources and support are available to all staff, including those not deployed to the frontline.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Naming the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it. Archived original document 28 Feb 2020. Web.archive.org/web/202002280335651/https://who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-it. Accessed 26 Sep 2021.
2. Orru G, Ciacchini R, Gemignani A, Conversano C. Psychological intervention measures during the Covid-19 pandemic. Clin Neuropsychiatry. 2020;17(2):76–9. https://doi.org/10.36131/CN20200208.
3. Ofri D. The emotional epidemiology of H1N1 influenza vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2009;36(27):2594–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0911047.
4. Chew QH, Wei KC, Vasoo S, Chua HC, Sim K. Narrative synthesis of psychological and coping responses toward emerging infectious disease outbreaks in the general population: practical considerations for the COVID-19 pandemic. Singapore Med J. 2020;61(7):350–6. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2020046.
5. Rohr-Kirchgraber T, Sotto S, Brown C, Donegan DM, Crowley EM, Sharp S, Dilly C, O’Leary H. The guilt of not being on the frontlines of the pandemic. 2020. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/post-author/theresa-rohr-kirchgraber-sylk-sotto-cynthia-brown-diane-m-donegan-erin-m-crowley-sacha-sharp-christen-dilly-heather-oleary. Accessed 11 Jun 2020.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献