Abstract
AbstractThe simulation community has effectively responded to calls for a more direct contribution by simulation to healthcare quality and safety, and clearer alignment with health service priorities, but the conceptual framing of this contribution has been vague. The term ‘translational simulation’ was proposed in 2017 as a “functional term for how simulation may be connected directly with health service priorities and patient outcomes, through interventional and diagnostic functions” (Brazil V. Adv Simul. 2:20, 2017). Six years later, this conceptual framing is clearer. Translational simulation has been applied in diverse contexts, affording insights into its strengths and limitations. Three core concepts are identifiable in recently published translational simulation studies: a clear identification of simulation purpose, an articulation of the simulation process, and an engagement with the conceptual foundations of translational simulation practice. In this article, we reflect on current translational simulation practice and scholarship, especially with respect to these three core concepts, and offer a further elaborated conceptual model based on its use to date.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference108 articles.
1. Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC, Cohen ER, O’Leary KJ, Wayne DB. Simulation-based mastery learning reduces complications during central venous catheter insertion in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2697–701.
2. Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, Akande V, Winter C, Reading S, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2006;113(2):177–82.
3. McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM, Stefanidis D. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simulation in Healthcare: Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2011;6(Suppl):S42-7.
4. Ratnapalan S, Lang D. Health care organizations as complex adaptive systems. Health Care Manage. 2020;39(1):18–23.
5. Six Domains of Healthcare Quality. Rockville, MD.: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2022. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/measures/six-domains.html
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献