Author:
Wang Xuedong,Liu Yanle,Miao Xinyao,Chen Yin,Cao Xiao,Zhang Yuchen,Li Shuaicheng,Zhou Qin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Age estimation from panoramic radiographs is a fundamental task in forensic sciences. Previous age assessment studies mainly focused on juvenile rather than elderly populations (> 25 years old). Most proposed studies were statistical or scoring-based, requiring wet-lab experiments and professional skills, and suffering from low reliability.
Result
Based on Soft Stagewise Regression Network (SSR-Net), we developed DENSEN to estimate the chronological age for both juvenile and older adults, based on their orthopantomograms (OPTs, also known as orthopantomographs, pantomograms, or panoramic radiographs). We collected 1903 clinical panoramic radiographs of individuals between 3 and 85 years old to train and validate the model. We evaluated the model by the mean absolute error (MAE) between the estimated age and ground truth. For different age groups, 3–11 (children), 12–18 (teens), 19–25 (young adults), and 25+ (adults), DENSEN produced MAEs as 0.6885, 0.7615, 1.3502, and 2.8770, respectively. Our results imply that the model works in situations where genders are unknown. Moreover, DENSEN has lower errors for the adult group (> 25 years) than other methods. The proposed model is memory compact, consuming about 1.0 MB of memory overhead.
Conclusions
We introduced a novel deep learning approach DENSEN to estimate a subject’s age from a panoramic radiograph for the first time. Our approach required less laboratory work compared with existing methods. The package we developed is an open-source tool and applies to all different age groups.
Funder
Xi’an Jiaotong University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference67 articles.
1. Akleman E. Deep learning. Computer. 2020;53:17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2020.3004171.
2. Beall A. Ai could match missing kids to old photos. New Sci. 2017;3154:14.
3. Burton A, Wilson S, Cowan M, Bruce V. Face recognition in poor-quality video; evidence from security surveillance. Psychol Sci. 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00144.
4. Cale J, Holt T, Leclerc B, Singh S, Drew J. Crime commission processes in child sexual abuse material production and distribution: a systematic review. Trends Issues Crime Criminal Justice. 2021;617:1–22.
5. Castner N, Kuebler TC, Scheiter K, Richter J, Eder T, Hüttig F, Keutel C, Kasneci E. Deep semantic gaze embedding and scanpath comparison for expertise classification during opt viewing. In: ACM symposium on eye tracking research and applications. 2020. p. 1–10.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献