Author:
Wang Jiaqi,Li Zeyu,Zhang Jiawan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Bioinformatics has gained much attention as a fast growing interdisciplinary field. Several attempts have been conducted to explore the field of bioinformatics by bibliometric analysis, however, such works did not elucidate the role of visualization in analysis, nor focus on the relationship between sub-topics of bioinformatics.
Results
First, the hotspot of bioinformatics has moderately shifted from traditional molecular biology to omics research, and the computational method has also shifted from mathematical model to data mining and machine learning. Second, DNA-related topics are bridge topics in bioinformatics research. These topics gradually connect various sub-topics that are relatively independent at first. Third, only a small part of topics we have obtained involves a number of computational methods, and the other topics focus more on biological aspects. Fourth, the proportion of computing-related topics hit a trough in the 1980s. During this period, the use of traditional calculation methods such as mathematical model declined in a large proportion while the new calculation methods such as machine learning have not been applied in a large scale. This proportion began to increase gradually after the 1990s. Fifth, although the proportion of computing-related topics is only slightly higher than the original, the connection between other topics and computing-related topics has become closer, which means the support of computational methods is becoming increasingly important for the research of bioinformatics.
Conclusions
The results of our analysis imply that research on bioinformatics is becoming more diversified and the ranking of computational methods in bioinformatics research is also gradually improving.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference22 articles.
1. Roos DS. Bioinformatics-trying to swim in a sea of data. Science. 2001;291(5507):1260–1.
2. Patra SK, Mishra S. Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature. Scientometrics. 2006;67(3):477–89.
3. Chen Y-S, Leimkuhler FF. A relationship between Lotka’s law, Bradford’s law, and Zipf’s law. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1986;37(5):307–14.
4. Glänzel W, Janssens F, Thijs B. A comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics. Scientometrics. 2009;79(1):109–29.
5. Song M, Kim S, Zhang G, Ding Y, Chambers T. Productivity and influence in bioinformatics: a bibliometric analysis using pubmed central. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 2014;65(2):352–71.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献