Iam hiQ—a novel pair of accuracy indices for imputed genotypes
-
Published:2022-01-24
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2105
-
Container-title:BMC Bioinformatics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Bioinformatics
Author:
Rosenberger AlbertORCID, Tozzi Viola, Bickeböller Heike, Hung Rayjean J., Christiani David C., Caporaso Neil E., Liu Geoffrey, Bojesen Stig E., Le Marchand Loic, Albanes Demetrios, Aldrich Melinda C., Tardon Adonina, Fernández-Tardón Guillermo, Rennert Gad, Field John K., Davies Mike, Liloglou Triantafillos, Kiemeney Lambertus A., Lazarus Philip, Haugen Aage, Zienolddiny Shanbeh, Lam Stephen, Schabath Matthew B., Andrew Angeline S., Duell Eric J., Arnold Susanne M., Brunnström Hans, Melander Olle, Goodman Gary E., Chen Chu, Doherty Jennifer A., Teare Marion Dawn, Cox Angela, Woll Penella J., Risch Angela, Muley Thomas R., Johansson Mikael, Brennan Paul, Landi Maria Teresa, Shete Sanjay S., Amos Christopher I.,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Imputation of untyped markers is a standard tool in genome-wide association studies to close the gap between directly genotyped and other known DNA variants. However, high accuracy with which genotypes are imputed is fundamental. Several accuracy measures have been proposed and some are implemented in imputation software, unfortunately diversely across platforms. In the present paper, we introduce Iam hiQ, an independent pair of accuracy measures that can be applied to dosage files, the output of all imputation software. Iam (imputation accuracy measure) quantifies the average amount of individual-specific versus population-specific genotype information in a linear manner. hiQ (heterogeneity in quantities of dosages) addresses the inter-individual heterogeneity between dosages of a marker across the sample at hand.
Results
Applying both measures to a large case–control sample of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO), comprising 27,065 individuals, we found meaningful thresholds for Iam and hiQ suitable to classify markers of poor accuracy. We demonstrate how Manhattan-like plots and moving averages of Iam and hiQ can be useful to identify regions enriched with less accurate imputed markers, whereas these regions would by missed when applying the accuracy measure info (implemented in IMPUTE2).
Conclusion
We recommend using Iam hiQ additional to other accuracy scores for variant filtering before stepping into the analysis of imputed GWAS data.
Funder
National Institutes of Health Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference30 articles.
1. NCBI Variation Summary. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/dbvar/content/org_summary/ 2. Lindgren D, Hoglund M, Vallon-Christersson J. Genotyping techniques to address diversity in tumors. Adv Cancer Res. 2011;112:151–82. 3. Hickey JM, Cleveland MA, Maltecca C, Gorjanc G, Gredler B, Kranis A. Genotype imputation to increase sample size in pedigreed populations. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:395–410. 4. Das S, Abecasis GR, Browning BL. Genotype imputation from large reference panels. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2018;19:73–96. 5. Marchini J, Howie B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(7):499–511.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|