Abstract
Abstract
Background
Protein structural rigidity was analyzed in a non-redundant ensemble of high-resolution protein crystal structures by means of the Hirshfeld test, according to which the components (uX and uY) of the B-factors of two atoms (X and Y) along the interatomic direction is related to their degree of rigidity: the atoms may move as a rigid body if uX = uY and they cannot if uX ≠ uY.
Results
It was observed that the rigidity degree diminishes if the number of covalent bonds intercalated between the two atoms (d_seq) increases, while it is rather independent on the Euclidean distance between the two atoms (d): for a given value of d_seq, the difference between uX and uY does not depend on d. No additional rigidity decline is observed when d_seq ≥ ~ 30 and this upper limit is very modest, close to 0.015 Å.
Conclusions
This suggests that protein flexibility is not fully described by B-factors that capture only partially the wide range of distortions that proteins can afford.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computer Science Applications,Molecular Biology,Biochemistry,Structural Biology
Reference51 articles.
1. Rundong Zhao R, Qi F, Zhang R-Q, Van Hove MA. How does the flexibility of molecules affect the performance of molecular rotors? J Phys Chem. 2018;122:25067–74.
2. Landry SJ, Taher A, Georgopoulos C, van de Vies SM. Interplay of structure and disorder in cochaperonin mobile loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:11622–7.
3. Vihinen M. Relationship of protein flexibility to thermostability. Protein Eng. 1987;1:477–80.
4. Heringa J, Argos P. Strain in protein structures as viewed through nonrotameric side chains: I. Their position and interaction. Proteins. 1999;37:30–43.
5. Daniel RM, Dunn RV, Finney JL, Smith JC. The role of dynamics in enzyme activity. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2003;32:69–92.