Combining generative modelling and semi-supervised domain adaptation for whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography segmentation
-
Published:2023-12-20
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:
-
ISSN:1532-429X
-
Container-title:Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Cardiovasc Magn Reson
Author:
Muffoletto MaricaORCID, Xu Hao, Kunze Karl P., Neji Radhouene, Botnar René, Prieto Claudia, Rückert Daniel, Young Alistair A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Quantification of three-dimensional (3D) cardiac anatomy is important for the evaluation of cardiovascular diseases. Changes in anatomy are indicative of remodeling processes as the heart tissue adapts to disease. Although robust segmentation methods exist for computed tomography angiography (CTA), few methods exist for whole-heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiograms (CMRA) which are more challenging due to variable contrast, lower signal to noise ratio and a limited amount of labeled data.
Methods
Two state-of-the-art unsupervised generative deep learning domain adaptation architectures, generative adversarial networks and variational auto-encoders, were applied to 3D whole heart segmentation of both conventional (n = 20) and high-resolution (n = 45) CMRA (target) images, given segmented CTA (source) images for training. An additional supervised loss function was implemented to improve performance given 10%, 20% and 30% segmented CMRA cases. A fully supervised nn-UNet trained on the given CMRA segmentations was used as the benchmark.
Results
The addition of a small number of segmented CMRA training cases substantially improved performance in both generative architectures in both standard and high-resolution datasets. Compared with the nn-UNet benchmark, the generative methods showed substantially better performance in the case of limited labelled cases. On the standard CMRA dataset, an average 12% (adversarial method) and 10% (variational method) improvement in Dice score was obtained.
Conclusions
Unsupervised domain-adaptation methods for CMRA segmentation can be boosted by the addition of a small number of supervised target training cases. When only few labelled cases are available, semi-supervised generative modelling is superior to supervised methods.
Funder
EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Medical Imaging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Reference26 articles.
1. Ben-David S, Blitzer J, Crammer K, Kulesza A, Pereira F, Vaughan JW. A theory of learning from different domains. Mach Learn. 2010;79(1–2):151–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-009-5152-4. 2. Bernard O, Lalande A, Zotti C, Cervenansky F, Yang X, Heng PA, Cetin I, et al. Deep learning techniques for automatic MRI cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018;37(11):2514–25. 3. Bhuva AN, Bai W, Lau C, Davies RH, Ye Y, Bulluck H, McAlindon E, Culotta V, Swoboda PP, Captur G, Treibel TA, Augusto JB, Knott KD, Seraphim A, Cole GD, Petersen SE, Edwards NC, Greenwood JP, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Hughes AD, Rueckert D, Moon JC, Manisty CH. A multicenter, scan-rescan, human and machine learning cmr study to test generalizability and precision in imaging biomarker analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(10): e009214. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009214. 4. Bustin A, Rashid I, Cruz G, Hajhosseiny R, Correia T, Neji R, Rajani R, Ismail TF, Botnar RM, Prieto C. 3D whole-heart isotropic sub-millimeter resolution coronary magnetic resonance angiography with non-rigid motion-compensated PROST. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020;22(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00611-5. 5. Charlier F, Weber M, Izak D, Harkin E, Magnus M, Lalli J, Fresnais L, et al. Statannotations. 2022. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7213391.
|
|