The relation between the surface composition anomaly and distribution of the exosphere of Mercury
-
Published:2023-11-20
Issue:1
Volume:75
Page:
-
ISSN:1880-5981
-
Container-title:Earth, Planets and Space
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Earth Planets Space
Author:
Suzuki YudaiORCID, Yoshioka Kazuo, Murakami Go, Yoshikawa Ichiro
Abstract
AbstractIn celestial bodies with tenuous collisionless atmospheres, such as Mercury, the spatial distribution of the exosphere is expected to reflect the surface composition. In this study, we discuss whether the distributions of Mg, Ca, and Na, the primary exospheric components of Mercury, have a local exosphere–surface correlation by analyzing the observation data of the Mercury Atmospheric and Surface Composition Spectrometer (MASCS) and X-ray spectrometer (XRS) onboard the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) spacecraft. It was found that Mg has a strong local exosphere–surface correlation and Ca has a weak correlation. The Monte Carlo simulations of trajectories in the exosphere show that the weak correlation of Ca is due to the relatively large solar radiation acceleration. In addition, Na production rate in high-temperature regions is longitudinally dependent. This can be explained by considering that the weakly physisorbed Na layer on the surface is depleted under high temperature and that the distribution of strongly chemisorbed Na atoms is reflected in the exosphere. Based on these results, the conditions for components with a correlation in celestial bodies with thin atmospheres may include low volatility and low solar radiation acceleration.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Geology
Reference34 articles.
1. Bunce EJ, Martindale A, Lindsay S, Muinonen K, Rothery DA, Pearson J, McDonnell I, Thomas C, Thornhill J, Tikkanen T, Feldman C, Huovelin J, Korpela S, Esko E, Lehtolainen A, Treis J, Majewski P, Hilchenbach M, Väisänen T, Luttinen A, Kohout T, Penttilä A, Bridges J, Joy KH, Alcacera-Gil MA, Alibert G, Anand M, Bannister N, Barcelo-Garcia C, Bicknell C, Blake O, Bland P, Butcher G, Cheney A, Christensen U, Crawford T, Crawford IA, Dennerl K, Dougherty M, Drumm P, Fairbend R, Genzer M, Grande M, Hall GP, Hodnett R, Houghton P, Imber S, Kallio E, Lara ML, Margeli AB, Mas-Hesse MJ, Maurice S, Milan S, Millington-Hotze P, Nenonen S, Nittler L, Okada T, Ormö J, Perez-Mercader J, Poyner R, Robert E, Ross D, Pajas-Sanz M, Schyns E, Seguy J, Strüder L, Vaudon N, Viceira-Martín J, Williams H, Willingale D, Yeoman T (2020) The Bepicolombo mercury imaging x-ray spectrometer: science goals, instrument performance and operations. Space Sci Rev 216:126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-020-00750-2 2. Burger MH, Killen RM, McClintock WE, Merkel AW, Vervack RJ Jr, Cassidy TA, Sarantos M (2014) Seasonal variations in Mercury’s dayside calcium exosphere. Icarus 238:51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.04.049 3. Cassidy TA, Merkel AW, Burger MH, Sarantos M, Killen RM, McClintock WE, Vervack RJ Jr (2015) Mercury’s seasonal sodium exosphere: MESSENGER orbital observations. Icarus 248:547–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.10.037 4. Cassidy TA, McClintock WE, Killen RM, Sarantos M, Merkel AW, Vervack RJ Jr, Burger MH (2016) A cold-pole enhancement in Mercury’s sodium exosphere. Geophys Res Lett 43:11121–11128. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071071 5. Chamberlain JW (1963) Planetary coronae and atmospheric evaporation. Planet Space Sci 11:911–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(63)90122-3
|
|