Abstract
AbstractA hierarchical space–time version of the epidemic-type aftershock sequence (HIST–ETAS) model was constructed for an optimally adapted fit to diverse seismicity features characterized by anisotropic clustering as well as regionally distinct parameters. This manuscript validates this elaborate model for short-term prediction based on several years of recent inland Japan earthquakes as a testing data set, by evaluating the results using a log-likelihood ratio score. To consider intermediate- and long-term performance, several types of space–time Poisson models are compared with the background seismicity rate of the HIST–ETAS model. Results show first that the HIST–ETAS model has the best short-term prediction results for earthquakes in the range of magnitudes from M4.0 to M5.0, although, for the larger earthquakes, sufficient recent earthquake data is lacking to evaluate the performance. Second, for intermediate-term predictions, the optimal spatial nonuniform Poisson intensity model has a better forecast performance than the seismic background intensity of the HIST–ETAS model, while the uniform rate Poisson model throughout all of inland Japan has the worst forecast performance. For earthquakes of M6 or larger, the performance of retrospective long-term forecasts was tested in two ways. First, a retrospective forecasting experiment divided the entire period from 1885 to the present into two parts, with the recent ~ 30 years as the forecast period. Second, the historical damaging earthquake data (599–1884) were spatially validated using century data from 1885 to the present. In both validations, it was determined that the spatial intensity of the inland background seismic activity of the HIST–ETAS model is much better than the best-fit nonuniform Poisson spatial model, leading to the best results. The findings of this study will be critical for regional earthquake hazard planning in Japan and similar locations worldwide.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
he MEXT Project for Seismology toward Research Innovation with Data of Earthquake
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Space and Planetary Science,Geology
Reference33 articles.
1. Japan Meteorological Agency (2021) The Seismological Bulletin of Japan, https://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/bulletin/index_e.html, last accessed in 13 February 2022
2. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19(6):716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
3. Akaike H (1978) A new look at the Bayes procedure. Biometrika 65:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/65.1.53
4. Akaike H (1980). Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. In: Bayesian Statistics, JM Bernardo, MH DeGroot, DV Lindley and AFM Smith, eds., Valencia, Spain; University Press, pp 143–166, (discussion 185–203)
5. Gutenberg B, Richter CH (1944) Frequency of earthquakes in California. Bull Seism Soc Am 34:185–188
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献