Uncertainty in hourly mean data from classical magnetometers

Author:

Curto J. J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractHourly mean values obtained from analog magnetometers in what can be considered the “classical” period constitute the largest quantity of data we have on the evolution of the Earth’s magnetic field. They are used for a wide variety of applications such as estimating long-term solar–terrestrial interactions, the production of magnetic indices, or studying geomagnetic secular variation originated in the Earth’s core. However, these data do not have an associated uncertainty that would allow us to quantify the final uncertainty of the results of these models. Hence, our study tries to assess the degree of uncertainty that these data actually have. In this paper, using Ebro Observatory classical instrumentation, we work out these uncertainties by estimating the particular uncertainties of each significant variable involved in the measuring procedure. Although the study is implemented for Ebro, the method can be applied to any other observatory. We found that, in general, uncertainties vary from one magnetic component to another, depending on the nature of the instruments that were used. In each component, we identified the weakest points where the biggest part of the error resides. With our results we can state that total uncertainties ranged from 1 to 4 nT.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Geology

Reference17 articles.

1. Curto JJ, Sanclement E, Torta JM (1996) Automatic measurement of magnetic records on photographic paper. Comput Geosci 22:359–368

2. Hogan R (2017) How to determine resolution uncertainty. Int J Metrol 24–1:20–27

3. Hrvoic I, Newitt LR (2011) Instruments and methodologies for measurement of the Earth’s magnetic field. In: Mandea M, Korte M (eds) Geomagnetic observations and models. IAGA Special Sopron Book Series, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht

4. ISO (1993) Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

5. Jankowski J, Sucksdorff C (1996) Guide for magnetic measurements and observatory practice. IAGA

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3