Author:
Liu Zhiqiang,Chen Jintao,Weng Chaoqun,Liu Bei,Lin Zhixiong
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many complications may occur after placement of the ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt) for hydrocephalus, and delayed shunt insufficiency (DSI) is among the most common. It is often caused by abdominal adhesions, which increases the difficulty of diagnosis. This study aimed to explore the clinical value of dynamic plain abdominal radiography (DPAR) as a simple diagnostic method for patients with DSI due to terminal adhesion of the peritoneal shunt after VP surgery.
Methods
A total of 30 patients with high suspicion of DSI due to abdominal adhesions after VP surgery were included. DPAR was used for prospective assessment. The interval between the first and second PAR was 4–6 h before surgery. If two plain abdominal radiography at different times indicated that the end of the shunt tube in the abdominal segment was fixed, it was diagnosed as DSI due to adhesion of the shunt tube at the abdominal end. The peritoneal end of the shunt tube was surgically repositioned. Postoperative DPAR was repeated to evaluate the distance of the shunt outlet within the abdominal segment.
Results
All cases showed clinical symptoms or imaging findings of shunt insufficiency. The diagnostic accuracy of DPAR was 96.67% (29/30). The end of the shunt tube in the abdominal segment of the preoperative group was fixed with abdominal plain film twice with a mean difference of 1.74 ± 1.18 cm. The mean postoperative change in the position of the end of the shunt tube in the abdominal section was 9.36 ± 2.64 cm, showing a significant difference compared with the preoperative group (P < 0.001). The mean postoperative EVANs index (0.37 ± 0.08) was significantly lower than the preoperative (0.42 ± 0.08) (P = 0.007), Glasgow coma scale score (12.8 ± 2.69) was higher than the mean preoperative score (11.36 ± 2.43) (P = 0.013).
Conclusion
DPAR is a simple and effective method for the diagnosis of shunt insufficiency caused by delayed abdominal end adhesion after VP shunt.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Afat S, Pjontek R, Nikoubashman O, Kunz WG, Brockmann MA, Ridwan H, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole-body ultra-low-dose CT for detection of mechanical ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications: a retrospective analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022;43:1597–602.
2. Jayanth A, Benabbas R, Chao J, Sinert R. Diagnostic modalities to determine ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:180–9.
3. Ferreira Furtado LM, Da Costa Val Filho JA, Moreira Faleiro R, Lima Vieira JA, Dantas Dos Santos AK. Abdominal complications related to ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a comprehensive review of literature. Cureus. 2021;13:e13230.
4. Ruf L, Greuter L, Guzman R, Soleman J. Distal shunt placement in pediatric ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery: an international survey of practice. Childs Nerv Syst. 2023;39(6):1555–63.
5. Balasubramaniam C. Shunt complications-staying out of trouble. Neurol India. 2021;69:S495–s501.