Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Characteristics and knowledge synthesis approach for 456 network meta-analyses: a scoping review

Published:2017-01-05 Issue:1 Volume:15 Page:
ISSN:1741-7015
Container-title:BMC Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:BMC Med

Author:

Zarin Wasifa,Veroniki Areti Angeliki,Nincic Vera,Vafaei Afshin,Reynen Emily,Motiwala Sanober S.,Antony Jesmin,Sullivan Shannon M.,Rios Patricia,Daly Caitlin,Ewusie Joycelyne,Petropoulou Maria,Nikolakopoulou Adriani,Chaimani Anna,Salanti Georgia,Straus Sharon E.,Tricco Andrea C.

Funder

Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health

Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis

Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation

Canadian Institutes of Health Research Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship Program

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12916-016-0764-6.pdf

Reference46 articles.

1. Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326.

2. Murad MH, Montori VM. Synthesizing evidence: shifting the focus from individual studies to the body of evidence. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2217–8.

3. Patsopoulos NA, Analatos AA, Ioannidis JP. Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA. 2005;293(19):2362–6.

4. Salanti G. Indirect and mixed-treatment comparison, network, or multiple-treatments meta-analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):80–97.

5. Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2313–24.

Cited by 68 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Two decades of network meta‐analysis: Roadmap to their applications and challenges;Research Synthesis Methods;2024-07-31

2. Sensitivity and Specificity of Using GPT-3.5 Turbo Models for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses;Annals of Internal Medicine;2024-06

3. Conduct and reporting of multivariate network meta-analyses: a scoping review;Journal of Clinical Epidemiology;2024-02

4. Sensitivity, specificity and avoidable workload of using a large language models for title and abstract screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses;2023-12-17

5. Mapping the characteristics, methodological quality and standards of reporting of network meta-analyses on antithrombotic therapies: An overview;International Journal of Cardiology;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号京ICP备18003416号-3