Abstract
Abstract
Background
Aggregate trends can be useful for summarizing large amounts of information, but this can obscure important distributional aspects. Some population subgroups can be worse off even as averages climb, for example. Distributional information can identify health inequalities, which is essential to understanding their drivers and possible remedies.
Methods
Using publicly available Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 41 sub-Saharan African countries from 1986 to 2019, we analyzed changes in coverage for eight key maternal and child health indicators: first dose of measles vaccine (MCV1); Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus (DPT) first dose (DPT1); DPT third dose (DPT3); care-seeking for diarrhea, acute respiratory infections (ARI), or fever; skilled birth attendance (SBA); and having four antenatal care (ANC) visits. To evaluate whether coverage diverged or converged over time across the wealth gradient, we computed several dispersion metrics including the coefficient of variation across wealth quintiles. Slopes and 5-year moving averages were computed to identify overall long-term trends.
Results
Average coverage increased for all quintiles and indicators, although the range and the speed at which they increased varied widely. There were small changes in the wealth-related gap for SBA, ANC, and fever. The wealth-related gap of vaccination-related indicators (DPT1, DPT3, MCV1) decreased over time. Compared to 2017, the wealth-gap between richest and poorest quintiles in 1995 was 7 percentage points larger for ANC and 17 percentage points larger for measles vaccination.
Conclusions
Maternal and child health indicators show progress, but the distributional effects show differential evolutions in inequalities. Several reasons may explain why countries had smaller wealth-related gap trends in vaccination-related indicators compared to others. In addition to service delivery differences, we hypothesize that the allocation of development assistance for health, the prioritization of vaccine-preventable diseases on the global agenda, and indirect effects of structural adjustment programs on health system-related indicators might have played a role.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Woodward A, Kawachi I. Why reduce health inequalities? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(12):923–9.
2. United Nations. Reduce inequality within and among countries. United Nations Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/inequality/. Accessed 7 Oct 2021.
3. United Nations Statistics Division. Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/goal-10. Accessed 3 Jan 2022.
4. World Health Organization. Children: improving survival and well-being. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/children-reducing-mortality. Accessed 23 Apr 2022.
5. STATcompiler. The DHS Program. https://www.statcompiler.com/en/. Accessed 11 Jan 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献