Author:
Douglas Ian J.,Peh Jerlyn,Mansfield Kathryn E.,Trelfa Anna,Fowler Tom,Boulter Matthew,Cleary Paul,Smith Jenifer,Edmunds W. John
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In 2021, whilst societies were emerging from major social restrictions during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the UK government instigated an Events Research Programme to examine the risk of COVID-19 transmission from attendance at cultural events and explore ways to enable people to attend a range of events whilst minimising risk of transmission. We aimed to measure any impact on risk of COVID-19 transmission from attendance at events held at or close to commercially viable capacity using routinely collected data.
Methods
Data were obtained on attendees at Phase 3 Events Research Programme events, for which some infection risk mitigation measures were in place (i.e. evidence of vaccination or a negative lateral flow test). Attendance data were linked with COVID-19 test result data from the UK Test and Trace system. Using a self-controlled case series design, we measured the within person incidence rate ratio for testing positive for COVID-19, comparing the rate in days 3 to 9 following event attendance (high risk period) with days 1 and 2 and 10–16 (baseline period). Rate ratios were adjusted for estimates of underlying regional COVID-19 prevalence to account for population level fluctuations in infection risk, and events were grouped into broadly similar types.
Results
From attendance data available for 188,851 attendees, 3357 people tested positive for COVID-19 during the observation period. After accounting for total testing trends over the period, incidence rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals for positive tests were 1.16 (0.53–2.57) for indoor seated events, 1.12 (0.95–1.30) for mainly outdoor seated events, 0.65 (0.51–0.83) for mainly outdoor partially seated events, and 1.70 (1.52–1.89) for mainly outdoor unseated multi-day events.
Conclusions
For the majority of event types studied in the third phase of the UK Events Research Programme, we found no evidence of an increased risk of COVID-19 transmission associated with event attendance. However, we found a 70% increased risk of infection associated with attendance at mainly outdoor unseated multi-day events. We have also demonstrated a novel use for self-controlled case series methodology in monitoring infection risk associated with event attendance.
Funder
UK Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference15 articles.
1. ERP Information. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/information-on-the-events-research-programme/information-on-the-events-research-programme (Accessed 18 Dec 2023).
2. ERP Science summary. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/events-research-programme-science/events-research-programme-science-board-statement-and-conflicts-of-interest (Accessed 18 Dec 2023).
3. ERP SCCS protocol. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/60e84dbd8fa8f50c76838674/A_self-controlled_case_series_study_to_measure_the_risk_of_SARS-CoV-2_infection_associated_with_attendance_at_an_Events_Research_Programme_event.pdf (Accessed 18 Dec 2023).
4. Smith LE, Potts HWW, Amlôt R, Fear NT, Michie S, Rubin GJ. Who is engaging with lateral flow testing for COVID-19 in the UK? The COVID-19 Rapid Survey of Adherence to Interventions and Responses (CORSAIR) study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e058060.
5. Petersen I, Douglas I, Whitaker H. Self controlled case series methods: an alternative to standard epidemiological study designs. BMJ. 2016;354:i4515.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献