Fotagliptin monotherapy with alogliptin as an active comparator in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Author:

Xu Mingtong,Sun Kan,Xu Wenjie,Wang Chuan,Yan Dewen,Li Shu,Cong Li,Pi Yinzhen,Song Weihong,Sun Qingyuan,Xiao Rijun,Peng Weixia,Wang Jianping,Peng Hui,Zhang Yawei,Duan Peng,Zhang Meiying,Liu Jianying,Huang Qingmei,Li Xuefeng,Bao Yan,Zeng Tianshu,Wang Kun,Qin Li,Wu Chaoming,Deng Chunying,Huang Chenghu,Yan Shuang,Zhang Wei,Li Meizi,Sun Li,Wang Yanjun,Li HongMei,Wang Guang,Pang Shuguang,Zheng Xianling,Wang Haifang,Wang Fujun,Su Xiuhai,Ma Yujin,Zhang Wei,Li Ziling,Xie Zuoling,Xu Ning,Ni Lin,Zhang Li,Deng Xiangqun,Pan Tianrong,Dong Qijuan,Wu Xiaohong,Shen Xingping,Zhang Xin,Zou Qijing,Jiang Chengxia,Xi Jue,Ma Jianhua,Sun Jingchao,Yan Li

Abstract

Abstract Background Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, which was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. Methods Patients with T2DM were randomized to receive fotagliptin (n = 230), alogliptin (n = 113) or placebo (n = 115) at a 2:1:1 ratio for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period, followed by an open-label treatment period, making up a total of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the superiority of fotagliptin over placebo in the change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. All serious or significant adverse events were recorded. Results After 24 weeks, mean decreases in HbA1c from baseline were -0.70% for fotagliptin, -0.72% for alogliptin and -0.26% for placebo. Estimated mean treatment differences in HbA1c were -0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62% to -0.27%) for fotagliptin versus placebo, and -0.46% (95% CI: -0.67% to -0.26%) for alogliptin versus placebo, and 0.02% (95%CI: -0.16% to 0.19%; upper limit of 95%CI < margin of 0.4%) for fotagliptin versus alogliptin. So fotagliptin was non-inferior to alogliptin. Compared with subjects with placebo (15.5%), significantly more patients with fotagliptin (37.0%) and alogliptin (35.5%) achieved HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. During the whole 52 weeks of treatment, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low for both of the fotagliptin and alogliptin groups (1.0% each). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any treatment group. Conclusions In summary, the study demonstrated improvement in glycemic control and a favorable safety profile for fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. Trial registration ClinicalTrail.gov NCT05782192.

Funder

Shenzhen Science and Technology Program for Undertake the National Science and Technology Major Project

Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3