The development of a core outcome set for studies of pregnant women with multimorbidity

Author:

Lee Siang IngORCID,Hanley StephanieORCID,Vowles ZoeORCID,Plachcinski RachelORCID,Moss NgawaiORCID,Singh MeghaORCID,Gale ChrisORCID,Fagbamigbe Adeniyi FrancisORCID,Azcoaga-Lorenzo AmayaORCID,Subramanian AnuradhaaORCID,Taylor BeckORCID,Nelson-Piercy CatherineORCID,Damase-Michel ChristineORCID,Yau ChristopherORCID,McCowan ColinORCID,O’Reilly DermotORCID,Santorelli GillianORCID,Dolk HelenORCID,Hope HollyORCID,Phillips KatherineORCID,Abel Kathryn M.ORCID,Eastwood Kelly-AnnORCID,Kent LisaORCID,Locock LouiseORCID,Loane MariaORCID,Mhereeg MohamedORCID,Brocklehurst PeterORCID,McCann SharonORCID,Brophy SineadORCID,Wambua StevenORCID,Hemali Sudasinghe Sudasing Pathirannehelage BuddhikaORCID,Thangaratinam ShakilaORCID,Nirantharakumar KrishnarajahORCID,Black MaireadORCID,

Abstract

Abstract Background Heterogeneity in reported outcomes can limit the synthesis of research evidence. A core outcome set informs what outcomes are important and should be measured as a minimum in all future studies. We report the development of a core outcome set applicable to observational and interventional studies of pregnant women with multimorbidity. Methods We developed the core outcome set in four stages: (i) a systematic literature search, (ii) three focus groups with UK stakeholders, (iii) two rounds of Delphi surveys with international stakeholders and (iv) two international virtual consensus meetings. Stakeholders included women with multimorbidity and experience of pregnancy in the last 5 years, or are planning a pregnancy, their partners, health or social care professionals and researchers. Study adverts were shared through stakeholder charities and organisations. Results Twenty-six studies were included in the systematic literature search (2017 to 2021) reporting 185 outcomes. Thematic analysis of the focus groups added a further 28 outcomes. Two hundred and nine stakeholders completed the first Delphi survey. One hundred and sixteen stakeholders completed the second Delphi survey where 45 outcomes reached Consensus In (≥70% of all participants rating an outcome as Critically Important). Thirteen stakeholders reviewed 15 Borderline outcomes in the first consensus meeting and included seven additional outcomes. Seventeen stakeholders reviewed these 52 outcomes in a second consensus meeting, the threshold was ≥80% of all participants voting for inclusion. The final core outcome set included 11 outcomes. The five maternal outcomes were as follows: maternal death, severe maternal morbidity, change in existing long-term conditions (physical and mental), quality and experience of care and development of new mental health conditions. The six child outcomes were as follows: survival of baby, gestational age at birth, neurodevelopmental conditions/impairment, quality of life, birth weight and separation of baby from mother for health care needs. Conclusions Multimorbidity in pregnancy is a new and complex clinical research area. Following a rigorous process, this complexity was meaningfully reduced to a core outcome set that balances the views of a diverse stakeholder group.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3