Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To adapt the Charlotte Attitudes Toward Sleep (CATS) scale, the only self-assessment instrument measuring non-dysfunctional attitudes toward sleep, into Portuguese and to study its psychometric properties in a Portuguese sample.
Method
A sample of 1858 participants, recruited through non-probabilistic methods, was randomly split in two subsamples; one was used to develop the CATS model, the other for testing model invariance. We used structural equation models to assess factorial validity, measurement invariance, and relationships with other variables (e.g., the Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire) through confirmatory factorial analysis and causal models using a robust maximum likelihood method with Satorra-Bentler correction.
Results
The CATS factorial model showed excellent evidence of factorial validity (robust CFI = 0.987, TLI = 0.979, SRMR = 0.026, RMSEA = 0.043), good reliability indicators (α and ώ1 > 0.75), and strict invariance of measurement (|∆CFI|< 0.01). CATS factors were weak-to-moderate predictors of sleep behaviors (β < 0.4). The scale showed evidence of divergent validity with the Karolinska Sleep Questionnaire. Some items had significant sensitivity problems and/or did not have adequate factorial weights and had to be dropped from the model.
Conclusions
The CATS is a new and promising scale with solid evidence of validity in terms of internal structure, but with sensitivity issues at item level. Further work should be carried out at item level to increase sensitivity and predictive validity, and further research with other samples, such as clinical sleep medicine patients, should be conducted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
2. Anders, M. P., Breckenkamp, J., Blettner, M., Schlehofer, B., & Berg-Beckhoff, G. (2014). Association between socioeconomic factors and sleep quality in an urban population-based sample in Germany. The European Journal of Public Health, 24(6), 968–973. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt175
3. APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). Retrieved July 31, 2023, from https://dictionary.apa.org/attitude
4. Barclay, N. L., Eley, T. C., Buysse, D. J., Rijsdijk, F. V., & Gregory, A. M. (2010). Genetic and environmental influences on different components of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index and their overlap. Sleep, 33(5), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/33.5.659
5. Clemente, V., Marques, D. R., Miller-Mendes, M., Morin, C. M., Serra, J., & Allen Gomes, A. (2023). The Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep scale: Dimensions of the European Portuguese DBAS-30 and development of a new short version (DBAS–SF–16). Sleep Medicine, 106, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SLEEP.2023.03.021