Psychological assessment in school contexts: ethical issues and practical guidelines

Author:

Cadime IreneORCID,Mendes Sofia A.

Abstract

Abstract Background Psychological assessment in school settings involves a range of complexities and ethical dilemmas that practitioners must navigate carefully. This paper provides a comprehensive review of common issues faced by school psychologists during assessments, discussing best practices and ethical guidelines based on codes from various professional organizations. Methods We examine the entire assessment process, from pre-assessment considerations like informed consent and instrument selection to post-assessment practices involving results communication and confidentiality. Key ethical concerns addressed include fairness in assessment, cultural and linguistic appropriateness of testing materials, and issues surrounding informed consent. Results Specific challenges discussed include selecting appropriate assessment instruments that reflect the diverse needs and backgrounds of students, ensuring fairness and removing bias in testing, and effectively communicating results to various stakeholders while maintaining confidentiality. We emphasize the importance of multi-source, multi-method assessment approaches and the critical role of ongoing professional development in ethical practice. Conclusion By adhering to established ethical standards and best practices, school psychologists can effectively support the educational and developmental needs of students. This paper outlines actionable recommendations and ethical considerations to help practitioners enhance the accuracy, fairness, and impact of their assessments in educational settings.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference57 articles.

1. Aldalur, A., Bridgett, T., & Pick, L. H. (2022). Psychological assessment reports for linguistically minoritized clients: Considerations for ethical and professional practice. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 53(6), 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000462

2. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. AERA.

3. American Psychological Association (2020). APA guidelines for psychological assessment and evaluation. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-psychological-assessment-evaluation.pdf

4. American Psychological Association (2022). APA guidelines for assessment and intervention with persons with disabilities. https://www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-assessment-intervention-disabilities.pdf

5. Association of Educational Assessment – Europe (n.d.). European framework of standards for educational assessment 1.0. https://aea-europe.net/standards-for-assessment/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3