Collective efficacy in soccer teams: a systematic review

Author:

Alves Mylena Aparecida RodriguesORCID,de Souza Lencina Marcus Vinicius,Paes Mayara Juliana,Stefanello Joice Mara Facco

Abstract

AbstractCollective efficacy, defined as a group’s shared belief about its conjoint capability to organize and execute courses of action, plays a pivotal role in understanding the dynamics of sports teams, since it influences what individuals choose to do as team members, how much they invest in motivational terms to perform actions, how much they work collectively, and for how long they persist despite failure. Through a systematic review, it was investigated how collective efficacy has been assessed in the context of soccer and which indicators, attributes, and psychometric properties have been contemplated in the instruments used. Following the PRISMA guidelines, 22 articles were retrieved through electronic databases (APA PsycINFO; SPORTDiscus; Science Direct; BVS; Web of Science; Scopus; PubMed; and Scielo), using as descriptors, in English, Spanish, and Portuguese, collective efficacy and soccer, combined by the Boolean operators AND and OR. The study did not delimit the initial year of publication for the searches carried out, including all articles found until January 14, 2021 (date of the last update). The following eligibility criteria were adopted: scientific articles published in journals; original studies, which specified the instrument used to assess collective efficacy and carried out with soccer athletes. Five instruments (FCEQ, CEQS, CEI, CEC, and CEQsoccer) that evaluated technical-tactical and psychological attributes associated with collective efficacy in soccer players were identified. In most studies, psychometric properties were restricted to content validity and reliability (internal consistency), and there were no suitable validation processes for the instruments used to measure collective efficacy, which can be considered a limiting factor for understanding this psychological construct in soccer modality.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference51 articles.

1. Atkinson, F., Short, S. E., & Martin, J. (2018). College soccer players’ perceptions of coach and team efficacy. The Sport Psychologist, 32(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2017-0066.

2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

3. Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for Constructing Self-Efficacy Scales. In F. Pajares, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, (pp. 307–337). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.

4. Bandura, A., Azzi, R. G., & Polydoro, S. (2008). Teoria Social Cognitiva - Conceitos Básicos [Cognitive social theory: basic concepts]. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

5. Bray, S. R. (2004). Collective efficacy, group goals, and group performance of a muscular endurance task. Small Group Research, 35(1), 230–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496403260531.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3