Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The aims of this study are to make the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale that explain why caffeine intake. Additionally, it is crucial to highlight that the adaptation of the scale involved a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to validate its structure and the need for this adaptation in the Turkish context.
Materials and methods
The study was carried out with a total of 200 university students, comprised of 93.5% female and 6.5% male participants, with a mean age of 21.74 ± 6.15 years who were actively studying in the faculties of the universities who accepted to participate voluntarily in the study were included. The Turkish version of the Motives for Caffeine Consumption Questionnaire (MCCQ) scale and the MCCQ was used as the data collection tools. To evaluate the statistical analysis findings, the margin of error was taken as 5%. The entire application was carried out with the R-project software. CFA was used to test the adaptation of the MCCQ scale from English to Turkish.
Results
The alpha internal consistency coefficient for the whole scale was calculated as 0.959. Just like the original scale, the Turkish version shows a six-factor structure: habit, alertness, mood, social, taste, and symptom management. In MCCQ-TR, it showed a low level of positive correlation with Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS). For the final scale with 23 items and 6 sub-dimensions, it was determined that the fit indices were at an acceptable level, and the internal consistency was highly reliable for all sub-dimensions and the total scale.
Conclusions
It has been determined that the Turkish version of the MCCQ is a valid and reliable measurement tool to operationalize the motives of caffeine consumption and to reveal possible differences in the motives regarding gender, age, and the type of caffeinated products consumed. The use of CFA in adapting the scale ensures the robustness of the structural validity in the Turkish context, making this adaptation a valuable contribution to the field.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference14 articles.
1. Ágoston, C., Urbán, R., Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., Rogers, P. J., & Demetrovics, Z. (2018). Why do you drink caffeine? The development of the Motives for Caffeine Consumption Questionnaire (MCCQ) and its relationship with gender, age and the types of caffeinated beverages. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 16(4), 981–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9822-3
2. Bayraktar, F., Erkman, F., & Kurtulus, E. (2012). Adaptation study of Yale food addiction scale. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 22(1), S38.
3. Choi, J. (2020). Motivations influencing caffeine consumption behaviors among college students in Korea: Associations with sleep quality. Nutrients, 12(4), 953. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12040953
4. Driver, E. M., Gushgari, A., Chen, J., & Halden, R. U. (2020). Alcohol, nicotine, and caffeine consumption on a public US university campus determined by wastewater-based epidemiology. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138492
5. EFSA Scientific Panel NDA. (2015). Scientific opinion on the safety of caffeine. EFSA Journal, 13(5), 4102.
http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/4102