Author:
Baertlein Luke,Dubad Bashir Ali,Sahelie Birhanu,Damulak Istifanus Chindong,Osman Mohammed,Stringer Beverley,Bestman Agatha,Kuehne Anna,van Boetzelaer Elburg,Keating Patrick
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study evaluated an early warning, alert and response system for a crisis-affected population in Doolo zone, Somali Region, Ethiopia, in 2019–2021, with a history of epidemics of outbreak-prone diseases. To adequately cover an area populated by a semi-nomadic pastoralist, or livestock herding, population with sparse access to healthcare facilities, the surveillance system included four components: health facility indicator-based surveillance, community indicator- and event-based surveillance, and alerts from other actors in the area. This evaluation described the usefulness, acceptability, completeness, timeliness, positive predictive value, and representativeness of these components.
Methods
We carried out a mixed-methods study retrospectively analysing data from the surveillance system February 2019–January 2021 along with key informant interviews with system implementers, and focus group discussions with local communities. Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed deductive and inductive approach. Surveillance quality indicators assessed included completeness, timeliness, and positive predictive value, among others.
Results
1010 signals were analysed; these resulted in 168 verified events, 58 alerts, and 29 responses. Most of the alerts (46/58) and responses (22/29) were initiated through the community event-based branch of the surveillance system. In comparison, one alert and one response was initiated via the community indicator-based branch. Positive predictive value of signals received was about 6%. About 80% of signals were verified within 24 h of reports, and 40% were risk assessed within 48 h. System responses included new mobile clinic sites, measles vaccination catch-ups, and water and sanitation-related interventions. Focus group discussions emphasized that responses generated were an expected return by participant communities for their role in data collection and reporting. Participant communities found the system acceptable when it led to the responses they expected. Some event types, such as those around animal health, led to the community’s response expectations not being met.
Conclusions
Event-based surveillance can produce useful data for localized public health action for pastoralist populations. Improvements could include greater community involvement in the system design and potentially incorporating One Health approaches.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference24 articles.
1. Relief Web. Ethiopia: Thousands hit by outbreak of acute watery diarrhoea during worst drought for decades. ReliefWeb. 2017. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/ethiopia/ethiopia-thousands-hit-outbreak-acute-watery-diarrhoea-during-worst-drought-decades.
2. Early warning alert and response (EWAR) in emergencies: an operational guide. [cited 2023 Feb 28]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240063587.
3. Smolinski MS, Crawley AW, Olsen JM, Jayaraman T, Libel M. Participatory disease surveillance: engaging communities directly in reporting, monitoring, and responding to health threats. JMIR Public Heal Surveill. 2017;3(4):e7540.
4. Balajee SA, Salyer SJ, Greene-Cramer B, Sadek M, Mounts AW. The practice of event-based surveillance: concept and methods. Global Secur Health Sci Policy. 2021;6(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23779497.2020.1848444.
5. Kuehne A, Keating P, Polonsky J, Haskew C, Schenkel K, Waroux OLP de, et al. Event-based surveillance at health facility and community level in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Glob Heal. 2019. [cited 2021 Sep 14];4(6):e001878. Available from: https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/6/e001878.