Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Syrian conflict has created the worst humanitarian refugee crisis of our time, with the largest number of people displaced. Many have sought refuge in Egypt, where they are provided with the same access to healthcare services as Egyptian citizens. Nevertheless, in addition to the existing shortcomings of the Egyptian health system, many obstacles specifically limit refugees’ access to healthcare. This study looks to assess equity across levels of care after observing services utilization among the Syrian refugees, and look at the humanitarian dilemma when facing resource allocation and the protection of the most vulnerable.
Methods
A cross‐sectional survey was used and collected information related to access and utilization of outpatient and inpatient health services by Syrian refugees living in Egypt. We used concentration index (CI), horizontal inequity (HI) and benefit incidence analysis (BIA) to measure the inequity in the use of healthcare services and distribution of funding. We decomposed inequalities in utilization, using a linear approximation of a probit model to measure the contribution of need, non-need and consumption influential factors.
Results
We found pro-rich inequality and horizontal inequity in the probability of refugees’ outpatient and inpatient health services utilization. Overall, poorer population groups have greater healthcare needs, while richer groups use the services more extensively. Decomposition analysis showed that the main contributor to inequality is socioeconomic status, with other elements such as large families, the presence of chronic disease and duration of asylum in Egypt further contributing to inequality. Benefit incidence analysis showed that the net benefit distribution of subsidies of UNHCR for outpatient and inpatient care is also pro-rich, after accounting for out-of-pocket expenditures.
Conclusion
Our results show that without equitable subsidies, poor refugees cannot afford healthcare services. To tackle health inequities, UNHCR and organisations will need to adapt programmes to address the social determinants of health, through interventions within many sectors. Our findings contribute to assessments of different levels of accessibility to healthcare services and uncover related sources of inequities that require further attention and advocacy by policymakers.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference87 articles.
1. United Nations General Assembly. 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49da0e466.html.
2. Refugee R, Plan R. 2018 in response to the Syria Crisis (2018). United Nations Refugee Agency (UNCHR). https://www.unhcr.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2019/05/3RP_2017_2018_EN.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
3. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Vulnerability assessment Syrian refugees in Egypt, 2017. Available at https://www.unhcr.org/eg/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2019/09/EVAR2017-2019-Online.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
4. Fares H, et al. Catastrophic health expenditure amongst refugees. AJHE. 2017;6(2):17–25.
5. El-Zanaty F, Way A. Egypt: DHS, 2005—final report. February 2006. Available at http://dhsprogram.com/publications/publication-fr176-dhs-final-reports.cfm. Accessed 08 Sept 2021.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献