Abstract
Abstract
Background
Studies from many contexts indicate that proximity to conflict is associated with increased likelihood of intimate partner violence (IPV), and girl child marriage is associated with both proximity to conflict and increased IPV. In this study, we consider whether girl child marriage acts as a mediator of the association between proximity to conflict and IPV in the context of Sri Lanka, which sustained long-term conflict until 2009.
Methods
We analyzed responses of currently partnered women between ages 18 and 49 in the 2016 Sri Lankan Demographic and Health Survey (N = 13,691). Using logistic regression analyses, we measured associations between proximity to conflict (residence in districts which were central, proximal, or distal to the regions where the war occurred) and the outcomes of IPV and girl child marriage, and secondarily assessed girl child marriage as a possible mediator of the association between proximity to conflict and past year IPV.
Results
Women residing in districts central to conflict, as compared to districts distal to conflict, had increased odds of past year sexual, physical, and emotional IPV, with the odds of sexual IPV increasing the most (adjusted odds ratio/aOR 4.19, 95% confidence interval/CI 2.08–8.41). Residing in districts proximal to conflict compared to those distal to conflict was associated with lower odds of past year physical and emotional IPV, with the greatest decrease in emotional IPV (aOR 0.31, CI 0.18–0.54). Girl child marriage was more likely in districts central to conflict as opposed to those distal to conflict (aOR 1.89, CI 1.22–2.93), and partially mediated the relationship between centrality to conflict and IPV.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that residing in districts central to conflict compared to those distal to conflict is associated with greater odds of IPV and girl child marriage in post-conflict Sri Lanka, with girl child marriage partially mediating the association between centrality to conflict and IPV. Residence in districts proximal to conflict appears protective against IPV. Future research should investigate what factors are responsible for decreased IPV in districts proximal to violence, and whether these factors can be reproduced to mitigate the increased prevalence of IPV in districts central to conflict.
Funder
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health (social science)
Reference52 articles.
1. García-Moreno C, Stöckl H. Violence against women, its prevalence and health consequences. Key Issues Ment Heal. 2013;178:1–11.
2. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women [Internet]. Vol. 53, WHO Press. World Health Organization; 2013 [cited 2018 May 7]. 279–284 p. Available from: www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html
3. Sengupta S. War’s End in Sri Lanka: Bloody Family Triumph. The New York Times [Internet]. 2009 May 19; Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/20/world/asia/20lanka.html
4. de Mel N, Peiris P, Gomez S. Broadening Gender: Why Masculinities Matter: Attitudes, practices and gender-based violence in four districts in Sri Lanka [Internet]. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Care International; 2013. Available from: http://www.care.org/sites/default/files/documents/Broadening-Gender_Why-Masculinities-Matter.pdf
5. Jayatilleke AC, Poudel KC, Yasuoka J, Jayatilleke AU, Jimba M. Intimate partner violence in Sri Lanka. Biosci Trends. 2010;4(3):90–5.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献