Managers as peer workers’ allies: A qualitative study of managers’ perceptions and actions to involve peer workers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services

Author:

Åkerblom Kristina BakkeORCID,Mohn-Haugen TorbjørnORCID,Agdal RitaORCID,Ness OttarORCID

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCitizens with experience and knowledge about what it is like to use mental health and substance use services are increasingly employed within similar services as peer workers. Peer workers are portrayed as achieving societal obligations and help ensure that the outputs from service provision are more effective. Even though peer workers have worked in mental health and substance use services for a while, few studies have focused on exploring managers’ experiences and perspectives about involving peer workers. This knowledge is needed because these managers can enable and hinder equitable involvement and collaboration with peer workers.MethodsA qualitative explorative study was chosen to explore the following research question:How do managers in Norwegian mental health and substance use services experience, relate to, and embrace peer workers as assets in these services?A researcher (Ph.D. student) and a coresearcher (peer worker) conducted four online focus groups with a strategic selection of 17 Norwegian mental health and substance use services managers who had some experience with the involvement of peer workers in their organizations.ResultsThe results identified using systematic text condensation are as follows: [1]Peer workers boost the ongoing shift toward increased service user involvement.[2]Peer workers are highly valued in the service transformation process.[3]Managers involve peer workers as partners in co-creation.The results show that managers connect with peer workers and facilitate their involvement in collaborative activities across the service cycle. Peer workers’ proximity to service users and bridging capacity is highlighted as the reasons for their involvement. Thus, peer workers are involved in co-defining challenges, co-designing potential solutions, co-delivering those service solutions, and, sometimes, co-assessing service solutions to rethink and improve services. As such, peer workers are considered partners in co-creation.ConclusionAs managers involve peer workers, they increasingly discover peer workers’ value, and because peer workers are involved, they increase their skills and capacity for collaboration. This research strengthens the knowledge base of the perceived value of peer workers’ roles, bringing in new perspectives from management about utilizing and evaluating peer worker roles.

Funder

The DAM Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Pshychiatric Mental Health

Reference71 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World mental health report: transforming mental health for all [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. ; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 6]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/356119.

2. Alford J, Head BW. Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy Soc. [Internet]. 2017 Jul 3 [cited 2021 Nov 24];36(3):397–413. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634.

3. Hartley J, Sørensen E, Torfing J. Collaborative innovation: a viable alternative to market competition and organizational entrepreneurship. Public Admin Rev [Internet]. 2013 Nov [cited 2022 May 31];73(6):821–30. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12136.

4. Gillard S, Gibson SL, Holley J, Lucock M. Developing a change model for peer worker interventions in mental health services: A qualitative research study. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci [Internet]. 2014;24(5):435–45. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84941172760&doi=10.1017%2fS2045796014000407&partnerID=40&md5=27b390645ceb0ea747dc763718142636.

5. Davidson L, Bellamy C, Guy K, Miller. Rebecca. Peer support among persons with severe mental illnesses: A review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2020 Dec 9];11(2):123–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3