Abstract
AbstractMedical 3D printing is a form of manufacturing that benefits patient care, particularly when the 3D printed part is patient-specific and either enables or facilitates an intervention for a specific condition. Most of the patient-specific medical 3D printing begins with volume based medical images of the patient. Several digital manipulations are typically performed to prescribe a final anatomic representation that is then 3D printed. Among these are image segmentation where a volume of interest such as an organ or a set of tissues is digitally extracted from the volumetric imaging data. Image segmentation requires medical expertise, training, software, and effort. The theme of image segmentation has a broad intersection with medical 3D printing. The purpose of this editorial is to highlight different points of that intersection in a recent thematic series within 3D Printing in Medicine.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Biomedical Engineering
Reference18 articles.
1. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, Giannopoulos AA, Cai T, Kumamaru KK, George E, Wake N, Caterson EJ, Pomahac B, Ho VB, Grant GT, Rybicki FJ. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2015;35:1965–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015140320.
2. Mitsouras D, Liacouras PC, Wake N, Rybicki FJ. Radiographics update: medical 3d printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 2020;40:E21–3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020190217.
3. Chepelev L, Wake N, Ryan J, Althobaity W, Gupta A, Arribas E, Santiago L, Ballard DH, Wang KC, Weadock W, Ionita CN, Mitsouras D, Morris J, Matsumoto J, Christensen A, Liacouras P, Rybicki FJ, Sheikh A. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios, 3D Print Med 4 (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-018-0030-y.
4. Belvedere C, Ortolani M, Marcelli E, Bortolani B, Matsiushevich K, Durante S, Cercenelli L, Leardini A. Comparison of Bone Segmentation Software over different anatomical parts. Appl Sci. 2022;12:6097. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app12126097.
5. Ravi P, Burch M, Liu IY, Byrd S. 3D printed flexible anatomical models for left atrial appendage closure planning and comparison of deep learning against radiologist image segmentation, (n.d.) 1–27. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2188108/v1.