Abstract
AbstractAugmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are burgeoning technologies that have the potential to greatly enhance patient care. Visualizing patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) imaging data in these enhanced virtual environments may improve surgeons’ understanding of anatomy and surgical pathology, thereby allowing for improved surgical planning, superior intra-operative guidance, and ultimately improved patient care. It is important that radiologists are familiar with these technologies, especially since the number of institutions utilizing VR and AR is increasing. This article gives an overview of AR and VR and describes the workflow required to create anatomical 3D models for use in AR using the Microsoft HoloLens device. Case examples in urologic oncology (prostate cancer and renal cancer) are provided which depict how AR has been used to guide surgery at our institution.
Funder
national institute of biomedical imaging and bioengineering
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Biomedical Engineering
Reference34 articles.
1. Fishman EK, Drebin B, Magid D, Scott WW Jr, Ney DR, Brooker AF Jr, et al. Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology. 1987;163(3):737–8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.163.3.3575725.
2. Rossnick S, Laub G, Braeckle R, et al. Three dimensional display of blood vessels in MRI. Proceedings of the IEEE Computers in Cardiology Conference. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1986:193–6.
3. Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, Dake MD, McDonnell CH, Song SM, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology. 1992;185(2):607–10. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.185.2.1410382.
4. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 1993;186(1):147–52. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.186.1.8416556.
5. Fishman EK, Ney DR, Heath DG, Corl FM, Horton KM, Johnson PT. Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. Radiographics. 2006;26(3):905–22. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.263055186.
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献